» Articles » PMID: 33705762

Channelrhodopsin C1C2: Photocycle Kinetics and Interactions Near the Central Gate

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2021 Mar 11
PMID 33705762
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Channelrhodopsins (ChR) are light-sensitive cation channels used in optogenetics, a technique that applies light to control cells (e.g., neurons) that have been modified genetically to express those channels. Although mutations are known to affect pore kinetics, little is known about how mutations induce changes at the molecular scale. To address this issue, we first measured channel opening and closing rates of a ChR chimera (C1C2) and selected variants (N297D, N297V, and V125L). Then, we used atomistic simulations to correlate those rates with changes in pore structure, hydration, and chemical interactions among key gating residues of C1C2 in both closed and open states. Overall, the experimental results show that C1C2 and its mutants do not behave like ChR2 or its analogous variants, except V125L, making C1C2 a unique channel. Our atomistic simulations confirmed that opening of the channel and initial hydration of the gating regions between helices I, II, III, and VII of the channel occurs with 1) the presence of 13-cis retinal; 2) deprotonation of a glutamic acid gating residue, E129; and 3) subsequent weakening of the central gate hydrogen bond between the same glutamic acid E129 and asparagine N297 in the central region of the pore. Also, an aspartate (D292) is the unambiguous primary proton acceptor for the retinal Schiff base in the hydrated channel.

Citing Articles

Metadynamics simulations reveal mechanisms of Na+ and Ca2+ transport in two open states of the channelrhodopsin chimera, C1C2.

Prignano L, Stevens M, Vanegas J, Rempe S, Dempski R PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0309553.

PMID: 39241014 PMC: 11379304. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309553.


Hydrated Anions: From Clusters to Bulk Solution with Quasi-Chemical Theory.

Gomez D, Pratt L, Asthagiri D, Rempe S Acc Chem Res. 2022; 55(16):2201-2212.

PMID: 35829622 PMC: 9386901. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00078.

References
1.
Bruegmann T, Malan D, Hesse M, Beiert T, Fuegemann C, Fleischmann B . Optogenetic control of heart muscle in vitro and in vivo. Nat Methods. 2010; 7(11):897-900. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1512. View

2.
Plazzo A, De Franceschi N, Da Broi F, Zonta F, Sanasi M, Filippini F . Bioinformatic and mutational analysis of channelrhodopsin-2 protein cation-conducting pathway. J Biol Chem. 2011; 287(7):4818-25. PMC: 3281600. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.326207. View

3.
Nina M, Roux B, Smith J . Functional interactions in bacteriorhodopsin: a theoretical analysis of retinal hydrogen bonding with water. Biophys J. 1995; 68(1):25-39. PMC: 1281657. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80184-0. View

4.
Stahlberg M, Ramakrishnan C, Willig K, Boyden E, Deisseroth K, Dean C . Investigating the feasibility of channelrhodopsin variants for nanoscale optogenetics. Neurophotonics. 2019; 6(1):015007. PMC: 6393647. DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.6.1.015007. View

5.
Phillips J, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E . Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem. 2005; 26(16):1781-802. PMC: 2486339. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20289. View