Deep Learning-based Reconstruction May Improve Non-contrast Cerebral CT Imaging Compared to Other Current Reconstruction Algorithms
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: To evaluate image quality and reconstruction times of a commercial deep learning reconstruction algorithm (DLR) compared to hybrid-iterative reconstruction (Hybrid-IR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms for cerebral non-contrast CT (NCCT).
Methods: Cerebral NCCT acquisitions of 50 consecutive patients were reconstructed using DLR, Hybrid-IR and MBIR with a clinical CT system. Image quality, in terms of six subjective characteristics (noise, sharpness, grey-white matter differentiation, artefacts, natural appearance and overall image quality), was scored by five observers. As objective metrics of image quality, the noise magnitude and signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) of the grey and white matter were calculated. Mean values for the image quality characteristics scored by the observers were estimated using a general linear model to account for multiple readers. The estimated means for the reconstruction methods were pairwise compared. Calculated measures were compared using paired t tests.
Results: For all image quality characteristics, DLR images were scored significantly higher than MBIR images. Compared to Hybrid-IR, perceived noise and grey-white matter differentiation were better with DLR, while no difference was detected for other image quality characteristics. Noise magnitude was lower for DLR compared to Hybrid-IR and MBIR (5.6, 6.4 and 6.2, respectively) and SDNR higher (2.4, 1.9 and 2.0, respectively). Reconstruction times were 27 s, 44 s and 176 s for Hybrid-IR, DLR and MBIR respectively.
Conclusions: With a slight increase in reconstruction time, DLR results in lower noise and improved tissue differentiation compared to Hybrid-IR. Image quality of MBIR is significantly lower compared to DLR with much longer reconstruction times.
Key Points: • Deep learning reconstruction of cerebral non-contrast CT results in lower noise and improved tissue differentiation compared to hybrid-iterative reconstruction. • Deep learning reconstruction of cerebral non-contrast CT results in better image quality in all aspects evaluated compared to model-based iterative reconstruction. • Deep learning reconstruction only needs a slight increase in reconstruction time compared to hybrid-iterative reconstruction, while model-based iterative reconstruction requires considerably longer processing time.
Pan Y, Yao X, Gao R, Xie W, Xia C, Li Z Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025; 55(6):1403-1409.
PMID: 39990832 PMC: 11839371. DOI: 10.12182/20241160102.
Inoue Y, Itoh H, Hata H, Miyatake H, Mitsui K, Uehara S Tomography. 2024; 10(12):2073-2086.
PMID: 39728909 PMC: 11679002. DOI: 10.3390/tomography10120147.
Chandran M O, Pendem S, P S P, Chacko C, Priyanka , Kadavigere R F1000Res. 2024; 13:691.
PMID: 38962692 PMC: 11221345. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.150773.1.
Du H, Sui X, Zhao R, Wang J, Ming Y, Piao S BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):163.
PMID: 38956583 PMC: 11218076. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01342-0.
Chandran M O, Pendem S, P S P, Chacko C, - P, Kadavigere R F1000Res. 2024; 13:274.
PMID: 38725640 PMC: 11079581. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.147345.1.