» Articles » PMID: 38480547

Improved Overall Image Quality in Low-dose Dual-energy Computed Tomography Enterography Using Deep-learning Image Reconstruction

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 Mar 14
PMID 38480547
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To demonstrate the clinical advantages of a deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in low-dose dual-energy computed tomography enterography (DECTE) by comparing images with standard-dose adaptive iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V) images.

Methods: In this Institutional review board approved prospective study, 86 participants who underwent DECTE were enrolled. The early-enteric phase scan was performed using standard-dose (noise index: 8) and images were reconstructed at 5 mm and 1.25 mm slice thickness with ASIR-V at a level of 40% (ASIR-V40%). The late-enteric phase scan used low-dose (noise index: 12) and images were reconstructed at 1.25 mm slice thickness with ASIR-V40%, and DLIR at medium (DLIR-M) and high (DLIR-H). The 70 keV monochromatic images were used for image comparison and analysis. For objective assessment, image noise, artifact index, SNR and CNR were measured. For subjective assessment, subjective noise, image contrast, bowel wall sharpness, mesenteric vessel clarity, and small structure visibility were scored by two radiologists blindly. Radiation dose was compared between the early- and late-enteric phases.

Results: Radiation dose was reduced by 50% in the late-enteric phase [(6.31 ± 1.67) mSv] compared with the early-enteric phase [(3.01 ± 1.09) mSv]. For the 1.25 mm images, DLIR-M and DLIR-H significantly improved both objective and subjective image quality compared to those with ASIR-V40%. The low-dose 1.25 mm DLIR-H images had similar image noise, SNR, CNR values as the standard-dose 5 mm ASIR-V40% images, but significantly higher scores in image contrast [5(5-5), P < 0.05], bowel wall sharpness [5(5-5), P < 0.05], mesenteric vessel clarity [5(5-5), P < 0.05] and small structure visibility [5(5-5), P < 0.05].

Conclusions: DLIR significantly reduces image noise at the same slice thickness, but significantly improves spatial resolution and lesion conspicuity with thinner slice thickness in DECTE, compared to conventional ASIR-V40% 5 mm images, all while providing 50% radiation dose reduction.

Citing Articles

A paradigm shift in oncology imaging: a prospective cross-sectional study to assess low-dose deep learning image reconstruction versus standard-dose iterative reconstruction for comprehensive lesion detection in dual-energy computed tomography.

Hou P, Liu N, Feng X, Chen Y, Wang H, Wang X Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(9):6449-6465.

PMID: 39281146 PMC: 11400683. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-197.

References
1.
Deepak P, Fletcher J, Fidler J, Barlow J, Sheedy S, Kolbe A . Radiological Response Is Associated With Better Long-Term Outcomes and Is a Potential Treatment Target in Patients With Small Bowel Crohn's Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 111(7):997-1006. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.177. View

2.
Yadav J, Chandra Regmi M, Basnet P, Guddy K, Bhattarai B, Poudel P . Butorphanol in Labour Analgesia. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2019; 56(214):940-944. PMC: 8827606. View

3.
Zhong J, Shen H, Chen Y, Xia Y, Shi X, Lu W . Evaluation of Image Quality and Detectability of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) Algorithm in Single- and Dual-energy CT. J Digit Imaging. 2023; 36(4):1390-1407. PMC: 10406981. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-023-00806-z. View

4.
Kim I, Kang H, Yoon H, Chung B, Shin N . Deep learning-based image reconstruction for brain CT: improved image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V). Neuroradiology. 2020; 63(6):905-912. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02574-x. View

5.
Pelt D, Batenburg K . Improving filtered backprojection reconstruction by data-dependent filtering. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2014; 23(11):4750-62. DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2014.2341971. View