» Articles » PMID: 33657098

Neural Modelling of the Encoding of Fast Frequency Modulation

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Mar 3
PMID 33657098
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Frequency modulation (FM) is a basic constituent of vocalisation in many animals as well as in humans. In human speech, short rising and falling FM-sweeps of around 50 ms duration, called formant transitions, characterise individual speech sounds. There are two representations of FM in the ascending auditory pathway: a spectral representation, holding the instantaneous frequency of the stimuli; and a sweep representation, consisting of neurons that respond selectively to FM direction. To-date computational models use feedforward mechanisms to explain FM encoding. However, from neuroanatomy we know that there are massive feedback projections in the auditory pathway. Here, we found that a classical FM-sweep perceptual effect, the sweep pitch shift, cannot be explained by standard feedforward processing models. We hypothesised that the sweep pitch shift is caused by a predictive feedback mechanism. To test this hypothesis, we developed a novel model of FM encoding incorporating a predictive interaction between the sweep and the spectral representation. The model was designed to encode sweeps of the duration, modulation rate, and modulation shape of formant transitions. It fully accounted for experimental data that we acquired in a perceptual experiment with human participants as well as previously published experimental results. We also designed a new class of stimuli for a second perceptual experiment to further validate the model. Combined, our results indicate that predictive interaction between the frequency encoding and direction encoding neural representations plays an important role in the neural processing of FM. In the brain, this mechanism is likely to occur at early stages of the processing hierarchy.

Citing Articles

Behavioral entrainment to rhythmic auditory stimulation can be modulated by tACS depending on the electrical stimulation field properties.

Cabral-Calderin Y, van Hinsberg D, Thielscher A, Henry M Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38289225 PMC: 10945705. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.87820.

References
1.
Pollak G, Gittelman J, Li N, Xie R . Inhibitory projections from the ventral nucleus of the lateral lemniscus and superior paraolivary nucleus create directional selectivity of frequency modulations in the inferior colliculus: a comparison of bats with other mammals. Hear Res. 2010; 273(1-2):134-44. PMC: 4317268. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.03.083. View

2.
Uppenkamp S, Fobel S, Patterson R . The effects of temporal asymmetry on the detection and perception of short chirps. Hear Res. 2001; 158(1-2):71-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(01)00299-4. View

3.
Nabelek I, Nabelek A, HIRSH I . Pitch of tone bursts of changing frequency. J Acoust Soc Am. 1970; 48(2):534-53. View

4.
Li A, Zhang A, Chen Q, Wu F . Effects of modulation range and presentation rate of FM stimulus on auditory response properties of mouse inferior collicular neurons. Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2010; 62(3):210-8. View

5.
Chambers C, Akram S, Adam V, Pelofi C, Sahani M, Shamma S . Prior context in audition informs binding and shapes simple features. Nat Commun. 2017; 8:15027. PMC: 5411480. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15027. View