» Articles » PMID: 11524578

Effects of Neuromodulation in a Cortical Network Model of Object Working Memory Dominated by Recurrent Inhibition

Overview
Specialties Biology
Neurology
Date 2001 Aug 29
PMID 11524578
Citations 272
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Experimental evidence suggests that the maintenance of an item in working memory is achieved through persistent activity in selective neural assemblies of the cortex. To understand the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, it is essential to investigate how persistent activity is affected by external inputs or neuromodulation. We have addressed these questions using a recurrent network model of object working memory. Recurrence is dominated by inhibition, although persistent activity is generated through recurrent excitation in small subsets of excitatory neurons. Our main findings are as follows. (1) Because of the strong feedback inhibition, persistent activity shows an inverted U shape as a function of increased external drive to the network. (2) A transient external excitation can switch off a network from a selective persistent state to its spontaneous state. (3) The maintenance of the sample stimulus in working memory is not affected by intervening stimuli (distractors) during the delay period, provided the stimulation intensity is not large. On the other hand, if stimulation intensity is large enough, distractors disrupt sample-related persistent activity, and the network is able to maintain a memory only of the last shown stimulus. (4) A concerted modulation of GABA(A) and NMDA conductances leads to a decrease of spontaneous activity but an increase of persistent activity; the enhanced signal-to-noise ratio is shown to increase the resistance of the network to distractors. (5) Two mechanisms are identified that produce an inverted U shaped dependence of persistent activity on modulation. The present study therefore points to several mechanisms that enhance the signal-to-noise ratio in working memory states. These mechanisms could be implemented in the prefrontal cortex by dopaminergic projections from the midbrain.

Citing Articles

Neural Circuitry-Related Biomarkers for Drug Development in Psychiatry: An Industry Perspective.

ODonnell P, Buhl D, Johannesen J, Lijffijt M Adv Neurobiol. 2024; 40:45-65.

PMID: 39562440 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-69491-2_2.


Maintenance of delay-period activity in working memory task is modulated by local network structure.

Yu D, Li T, Ding Q, Wu Y, Fu Z, Zhan X PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(9):e1012415.

PMID: 39226309 PMC: 11398668. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012415.


Cognitive mechanisms of learning in sequential decision-making under uncertainty: an experimental and theoretical approach.

Cecchini G, DePass M, Baspinar E, Andujar M, Ramawat S, Pani P Front Behav Neurosci. 2024; 18:1399394.

PMID: 39188591 PMC: 11346247. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1399394.


Constructing neural networks with pre-specified dynamics.

Mininni C, Zanutto B Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):18860.

PMID: 39143351 PMC: 11324765. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69747-z.


A Basal Ganglia model for understanding working memory functions in healthy and Parkinson's conditions.

Vigneswaran C, Nair S, Chakravarthy V Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(4):1913-1929.

PMID: 39104688 PMC: 11297868. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-023-10056-y.


References
1.
Koch K, Fuster J . Unit activity in monkey parietal cortex related to haptic perception and temporary memory. Exp Brain Res. 1989; 76(2):292-306. DOI: 10.1007/BF00247889. View

2.
Durstewitz D, Kelc M, Gunturkun O . A neurocomputational theory of the dopaminergic modulation of working memory functions. J Neurosci. 1999; 19(7):2807-22. PMC: 6786084. View

3.
Okubo Y, Suhara T, Suzuki K, Kobayashi K, Inoue O, Terasaki O . Decreased prefrontal dopamine D1 receptors in schizophrenia revealed by PET. Nature. 1997; 385(6617):634-6. DOI: 10.1038/385634a0. View

4.
Cepeda C, Radisavljevic Z, Peacock W, Levine M, BUCHWALD N . Differential modulation by dopamine of responses evoked by excitatory amino acids in human cortex. Synapse. 1992; 11(4):330-41. DOI: 10.1002/syn.890110408. View

5.
Amit D, Brunel N . Model of global spontaneous activity and local structured activity during delay periods in the cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 1997; 7(3):237-52. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/7.3.237. View