» Articles » PMID: 33651793

Using Deep Neural Networks to Evaluate Object Vision Tasks in Rats

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Mar 2
PMID 33651793
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the last two decades rodents have been on the rise as a dominant model for visual neuroscience. This is particularly true for earlier levels of information processing, but a number of studies have suggested that also higher levels of processing such as invariant object recognition occur in rodents. Here we provide a quantitative and comprehensive assessment of this claim by comparing a wide range of rodent behavioral and neural data with convolutional deep neural networks. These networks have been shown to capture hallmark properties of information processing in primates through a succession of convolutional and fully connected layers. We find that performance on rodent object vision tasks can be captured using low to mid-level convolutional layers only, without any convincing evidence for the need of higher layers known to simulate complex object recognition in primates. Our approach also reveals surprising insights on assumptions made before, for example, that the best performing animals would be the ones using the most abstract representations-which we show to likely be incorrect. Our findings suggest a road ahead for further studies aiming at quantifying and establishing the richness of representations underlying information processing in animal models at large.

Citing Articles

Unraveling the complexity of rat object vision requires a full convolutional network and beyond.

Muratore P, Alemi A, Zoccolan D Patterns (N Y). 2025; 6(2):101149.

PMID: 40041851 PMC: 11873012. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.101149.


Maintenance and transformation of representational formats during working memory prioritization.

Pacheco-Estefan D, Fellner M, Kunz L, Zhang H, Reinacher P, Roy C Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8234.

PMID: 39300141 PMC: 11412997. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52541-w.


A computationally informed comparison between the strategies of rodents and humans in visual object recognition.

Schnell A, Leemans M, Vinken K, Op de Beeck H Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 38079481 PMC: 10712954. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.87719.


Mice and primates use distinct strategies for visual segmentation.

Luongo F, Liu L, Ho C, Hesse J, Wekselblatt J, Lanfranchi F Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 36790170 PMC: 9981152. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.74394.


Marmoset core visual object recognition behavior is comparable to that of macaques and humans.

Kell A, Bokor S, Jeon Y, Toosi T, Issa E iScience. 2023; 26(1):105788.

PMID: 36594035 PMC: 9804140. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105788.


References
1.
Zoccolan D . Invariant visual object recognition and shape processing in rats. Behav Brain Res. 2015; 285:10-33. PMC: 4383365. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.053. View

2.
Khaligh-Razavi S, Kriegeskorte N . Deep supervised, but not unsupervised, models may explain IT cortical representation. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014; 10(11):e1003915. PMC: 4222664. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003915. View

3.
Yamins D, Hong H, Cadieu C, Solomon E, Seibert D, DiCarlo J . Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(23):8619-24. PMC: 4060707. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1403112111. View

4.
Zoccolan D, Oertelt N, DiCarlo J, Cox D . A rodent model for the study of invariant visual object recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(21):8748-53. PMC: 2679579. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811583106. View

5.
Bracci S, Ritchie J, Kalfas I, Op de Beeck H . The Ventral Visual Pathway Represents Animal Appearance over Animacy, Unlike Human Behavior and Deep Neural Networks. J Neurosci. 2019; 39(33):6513-6525. PMC: 6697402. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1714-18.2019. View