» Articles » PMID: 33631210

Auditory Cortex is Susceptible to Lexical Influence As Revealed by Informational Vs. Energetic Masking of Speech Categorization

Overview
Journal Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Feb 25
PMID 33631210
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Speech perception requires the grouping of acoustic information into meaningful phonetic units via the process of categorical perception (CP). Environmental masking influences speech perception and CP. However, it remains unclear at which stage of processing (encoding, decision, or both) masking affects listeners' categorization of speech signals. The purpose of this study was to determine whether linguistic interference influences the early acoustic-phonetic conversion process inherent to CP. To this end, we measured source level, event related brain potentials (ERPs) from auditory cortex (AC) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) as listeners rapidly categorized speech sounds along a /da/ to /ga/ continuum presented in three listening conditions: quiet, and in the presence of forward (informational masker) and time-reversed (energetic masker) 2-talker babble noise. Maskers were matched in overall SNR and spectral content and thus varied only in their degree of linguistic interference (i.e., informational masking). We hypothesized a differential effect of informational versus energetic masking on behavioral and neural categorization responses, where we predicted increased activation of frontal regions when disambiguating speech from noise, especially during lexical-informational maskers. We found (1) informational masking weakens behavioral speech phoneme identification above and beyond energetic masking; (2) low-level AC activity not only codes speech categories but is susceptible to higher-order lexical interference; (3) identifying speech amidst noise recruits a cross hemispheric circuit (AC → IFG) whose engagement varies according to task difficulty. These findings provide corroborating evidence for top-down influences on the early acoustic-phonetic analysis of speech through a coordinated interplay between frontotemporal brain areas.

Citing Articles

Hearing in categories and speech perception at the "cocktail party".

Bidelman G, Bernard F, Skubic K PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0318600.

PMID: 39883695 PMC: 11781644. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318600.


Neural correlates of phonetic categorization under auditory (phoneme) and visual (grapheme) modalities.

Bidelman G, York A, Pearson C Neuroscience. 2024; 565:182-191.

PMID: 39631659 PMC: 11700760. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.11.079.


Functional benefits of continuous vs. categorical listening strategies on the neural encoding and perception of noise-degraded speech.

Rizzi R, Bidelman G Brain Res. 2024; 1844:149166.

PMID: 39151718 PMC: 11399885. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149166.


Hearing in categories aids speech streaming at the "cocktail party".

Bidelman G, Bernard F, Skubic K bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38617284 PMC: 11014555. DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.03.587795.


Duplex perception reveals brainstem auditory representations are modulated by listeners' ongoing percept for speech.

Rizzi R, Bidelman G Cereb Cortex. 2023; 33(18):10076-10086.

PMID: 37522248 PMC: 10502779. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad266.


References
1.
Bidelman G, Lee C . Effects of language experience and stimulus context on the neural organization and categorical perception of speech. Neuroimage. 2015; 120:191-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.087. View

2.
Dehaene-Lambertz G, Pallier C, Serniclaes W, Sprenger-Charolles L, Jobert A, Dehaene S . Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception. Neuroimage. 2004; 24(1):21-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.039. View

3.
Scott S, Wise R . The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception. Cognition. 2004; 92(1-2):13-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.12.002. View

4.
Liberman A, Cooper F, SHANKWEILER D, Studdert-Kennedy M . Perception of the speech code. Psychol Rev. 1967; 74(6):431-61. DOI: 10.1037/h0020279. View

5.
Liberman A, Isenberg D, Rakerd B . Duplex perception of cues for stop consonants: evidence for a phonetic mode. Percept Psychophys. 1981; 30(2):133-43. DOI: 10.3758/bf03204471. View