Noise Differentially Impacts Phoneme Representations in the Auditory and Speech Motor Systems

Overview

Journal Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Specialty Science

Date 2014 Apr 30

PMID 24778251

Citations 95

Authors

Yi Du

Bradley R Buchsbaum

Cheryl L Grady

Claude Alain

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Although it is well accepted that the speech motor system (SMS) is activated during speech perception, the functional role of this activation remains unclear. Here we test the hypothesis that the redundant motor activation contributes to categorical speech perception under adverse listening conditions. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging study, participants identified one of four phoneme tokens (/ba/, /ma/, /da/, or /ta/) under one of six signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels (-12, -9, -6, -2, 8 dB, and no noise). Univariate and multivariate pattern analyses were used to determine the role of the SMS during perception of noise-impoverished phonemes. Results revealed a negative correlation between neural activity and perceptual accuracy in the left ventral premotor cortex and Broca's area. More importantly, multivoxel patterns of activity in the left ventral premotor cortex and Broca's area exhibited effective phoneme categorization when SNR ≥ -6 dB. This is in sharp contrast with phoneme discriminability in bilateral auditory cortices and sensorimotor interface areas (e.g., left posterior superior temporal gyrus), which was reliable only when the noise was extremely weak (SNR > 8 dB). Our findings provide strong neuroimaging evidence for a greater robustness of the SMS than auditory regions for categorical speech perception in noise. Under adverse listening conditions, better discriminative activity in the SMS may compensate for loss of specificity in the auditory system via sensorimotor integration.

Citing Articles

Disrupted Cross-Scale Network Associated With Cognitive-Emotional Disorders in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Li B, Xu X, Wu Y, Feng Y, Chen Y, Salvi R CNS Neurosci Ther. 2025; 31(1):e70234.

PMID: 39868748 PMC: 11770892. DOI: 10.1111/cns.70234.

Neural representation of sensorimotor features in language-motor areas during auditory and visual perception.

Zheng Y, Zhang J, Yang Y, Xu M Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):41.

PMID: 39799186 PMC: 11724955. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07466-5.

Sensory representations and pupil-indexed listening effort provide complementary contributions to multi-talker speech intelligibility.

McHaney J, Hancock K, Polley D, Parthasarathy A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30882.

PMID: 39730737 PMC: 11681126. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81673-8.

The role of inhibitory control in spoken word recognition: Evidence from cochlear implant users.

Colby S, Smith F, McMurray B Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 39(8):1059-1071.

PMID: 39649019 PMC: 11619773. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2024.2369178.

Left motor cortex contributes to auditory phonological discrimination.

Perron M, Ross B, Alain C Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(9.

PMID: 39329356 PMC: 11427950. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae369.

References

Rauschecker J, Scott S . Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat Neurosci. 2009; 12(6):718-24. PMC: 2846110. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2331. View

Corbetta M, Shulman G . Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002; 3(3):201-15. DOI: 10.1038/nrn755. View

Buchsbaum B, Olsen R, Koch P, Kohn P, Kippenhan J, Berman K . Reading, hearing, and the planum temporale. Neuroimage. 2005; 24(2):444-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.025. View

Obleser J, Wise R, Dresner M, Scott S . Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions. J Neurosci. 2007; 27(9):2283-9. PMC: 6673469. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4663-06.2007. View

Thompson R, Correia M, Cusack R . Vascular contributions to pattern analysis: comparing gradient and spin echo fMRI at 3T. Neuroimage. 2010; 56(2):643-50. PMC: 3084461. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.061. View

Chang E, Rieger J, Johnson K, Berger M, Barbaro N, Knight R . Categorical speech representation in human superior temporal gyrus. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13(11):1428-32. PMC: 2967728. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2641. View

Osnes B, Hugdahl K, Specht K . Effective connectivity analysis demonstrates involvement of premotor cortex during speech perception. Neuroimage. 2010; 54(3):2437-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.078. View

Scott S, Johnsrude I . The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends Neurosci. 2003; 26(2):100-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-2236(02)00037-1. View

Herman A, Houde J, Vinogradov S, Nagarajan S . Parsing the phonological loop: activation timing in the dorsal speech stream determines accuracy in speech reproduction. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(13):5439-53. PMC: 3711632. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1472-12.2013. View

10.

Rizzolatti G, Arbib M . Language within our grasp. Trends Neurosci. 1998; 21(5):188-94. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01260-0. View

11.

Callan D, Jones J, Callan A, Akahane-Yamada R . Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models. Neuroimage. 2004; 22(3):1182-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.006. View

12.

Sato M, Tremblay P, Gracco V . A mediating role of the premotor cortex in phoneme segmentation. Brain Lang. 2009; 111(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.03.002. View

13.

Poldrack R, Temple E, Protopapas A, Nagarajan S, Tallal P, Merzenich M . Relations between the neural bases of dynamic auditory processing and phonological processing: evidence from fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001; 13(5):687-97. DOI: 10.1162/089892901750363235. View

14.

Hickok G, Poeppel D . The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007; 8(5):393-402. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2113. View

15.

Scott S, Rosen S, Wickham L, Wise R . A positron emission tomography study of the neural basis of informational and energetic masking effects in speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004; 115(2):813-21. DOI: 10.1121/1.1639336. View

16.

Buchsbaum B, Baldo J, Okada K, Berman K, Dronkers N, DEsposito M . Conduction aphasia, sensory-motor integration, and phonological short-term memory - an aggregate analysis of lesion and fMRI data. Brain Lang. 2011; 119(3):119-28. PMC: 3090694. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.12.001. View

17.

Linke A, Vicente-Grabovetsky A, Cusack R . Stimulus-specific suppression preserves information in auditory short-term memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(31):12961-6. PMC: 3150893. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1102118108. View

18.

Garrido L, Vaziri-Pashkam M, Nakayama K, Wilmer J . The consequences of subtracting the mean pattern in fMRI multivariate correlation analyses. Front Neurosci. 2013; 7:174. PMC: 3786542. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00174. View

19.

Dubno J, Schaefer A . Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. DOI: 10.1121/1.403697. View

20.

Wilson S, Saygin A, Sereno M, Iacoboni M . Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nat Neurosci. 2004; 7(7):701-2. DOI: 10.1038/nn1263. View