» Articles » PMID: 37214801

Duplex Perception Reveals Brainstem Auditory Representations Are Modulated by Listeners' Ongoing Percept for Speech

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2023 May 22
PMID 37214801
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

So-called duplex speech stimuli with perceptually ambiguous spectral cues to one ear and isolated low- vs. high-frequency third formant "chirp" to the opposite ear yield a coherent percept supporting their phonetic categorization. Critically, such dichotic sounds are only perceived categorically upon binaural integration. Here, we used frequency-following responses (FFRs), scalp-recorded potentials reflecting phase-locked subcortical activity, to investigate brainstem responses to fused speech percepts and to determine whether FFRs reflect binaurally integrated category-level representations. We recorded FFRs to diotic and dichotic stop-consonants (/da/, /ga/) that either did or did not require binaural fusion to properly label along with perceptually ambiguous sounds without clear phonetic identity. Behaviorally, listeners showed clear categorization of dichotic speech tokens confirming they were heard with a fused, phonetic percept. Neurally, we found FFRs were stronger for categorically perceived speech relative to category-ambiguous tokens but also differentiated phonetic categories for both diotically and dichotically presented speech sounds. Correlations between neural and behavioral data further showed FFR latency predicted the degree to which listeners labeled tokens as "da" vs. "ga". The presence of binaurally integrated, category-level information in FFRs suggests human brainstem processing reflects a surprisingly abstract level of the speech code typically circumscribed to much later cortical processing.

References
1.
Krishnan A, McDaniel S . Binaural interaction in the human frequency-following response: effects of interaural intensity difference. Audiol Neurootol. 1998; 3(5):291-9. DOI: 10.1159/000013801. View

2.
Tadel F, Baillet S, Mosher J, Pantazis D, Leahy R . Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011; 2011:879716. PMC: 3090754. DOI: 10.1155/2011/879716. View

3.
Preisig B, Riecke L, Hervais-Adelman A . Speech sound categorization: The contribution of non-auditory and auditory cortical regions. Neuroimage. 2022; 258:119375. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119375. View

4.
Chang E, Rieger J, Johnson K, Berger M, Barbaro N, Knight R . Categorical speech representation in human superior temporal gyrus. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13(11):1428-32. PMC: 2967728. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2641. View

5.
Krishnan A, Gandour J, Bidelman G, Swaminathan J . Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem. Neuroreport. 2009; 20(4):408-13. PMC: 2692950. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283263000. View