» Articles » PMID: 31439258

Can DCE-MRI Reduce the Number of PI-RADS V.2 False Positive Findings? Role of Quantitative Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Prostate Lesions Characterization

Overview
Journal Eur J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Aug 24
PMID 31439258
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To test the potential impact of pharmacokinetic parameters, derived from DCE-MRI analysis, on the diagnostic performance of PI-RADSv.2 classification in prostate lesions characterization.

Method: Among patients who underwent multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) (January 2016-March 2018) followed by histological evaluation (targeted biopsies/prostatectomy), 103 men were retrospectively selected. For each patient the index lesion was identified and pharmacokinetic parameters (Ktrans, Kep, Ve, Vp) were assessed. MRI diagnostic performance in the detection of significant tumors [Gleason Score (GS)≥7] was assessed, considering PI-RADS≥3 as positive.

Results: GS ≥ 7 (n = 59) showed higher Ktrans (p < 0.01) and Kep (p = 0.01) compared to GS < 7. At ROC curve analysis, a Ktrans cut-off of 191 × 10/min was identified to predict the presence of GS ≥ 7 (AUC:0.75; sensitivity:95%; specificity:61%). Sensitivity and PPV of mpMRI using PI-RADSv.2 were 98% and 61%. Reclassifying PI-RADS≥3 lesions according to Ktrans cut-off, 22 false positives were shifted to true negatives with 3 false negative findings; PPV raised to 79%. Appling Ktrans cut-off to PI-RADS 3 lesions of peripheral zone (n = 18), 12 true negatives, 4 true positives, 2 false positives were identified.

Conclusions: Despite its high sensitivity prostate mpMRI generates many false positive cases: Ktrans in addition to PIRADS v.2 seems to improve MRI-PPV and may help in avoiding redundant biopsies.

Citing Articles

The Role of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluating Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A Partially-Blinded Retrospective Study of a Prostatectomy Patient Cohort With Whole Gland Histopathology Correlation and Application of PI-RADS....

Sridhar S, Abouelfetouh Z, Codreanu I, Gupta N, Zhang S, Efstathiou E Prostate. 2024; 85(5):413-423.

PMID: 39702937 PMC: 11848987. DOI: 10.1002/pros.24843.


Quantitative Analysis of Prostate MRI: Correlation between Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters.

Choi M, Lee Y, Han D, Kim D Curr Oncol. 2023; 30(12):10299-10310.

PMID: 38132384 PMC: 10743035. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30120750.


Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Study in the mpMRI of the Prostate-Unnecessary or Underutilised? A Narrative Review.

Guljas S, Dupan Krivdic Z, Dreznjak Madunic M, Sambic Penc M, Pavlovic O, Krajina V Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(22).

PMID: 37998624 PMC: 10670922. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13223488.


Parametric maps of spatial two-tissue compartment model for prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI - comparison with the standard tofts model in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Zhou X, Fan X, Chatterjee A, Yousuf A, Antic T, Oto A Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023; 46(3):1215-1226.

PMID: 37432557 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01289-6.


Parametric maps of spatial two-tissue compartment model for prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI - comparison with the standard Tofts model in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Zhou X, Fan X, Chatterjee A, Yousuf A, Antic T, Oto A Res Sq. 2023; .

PMID: 36798227 PMC: 9934750. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2539644/v1.