» Articles » PMID: 33446710

Comparison of Multi Echo T Relaxation and Steady State Approaches for Myelin Imaging in the Central Nervous System

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Jan 15
PMID 33446710
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The traditional approach for measuring myelin-associated water with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) uses multi-echo T relaxation data to calculate the myelin water fraction (MWF). A fundamentally different approach, abbreviated "mcDESPOT", uses a more efficient steady-state acquisition to generate an equivalent metric (f). Although previous studies have demonstrated inherent instability and bias in the complex mcDESPOT analysis procedure, f has often been used as a surrogate for MWF. We produced and compared multivariate atlases of MWF and f in healthy human brain and cervical spinal cord (available online) and compared their ability to detect multiple sclerosis pathology. A significant bias was found in all regions (p < 10), albeit reversed for spinal cord (f-MWF =  - 3.4%) compared to brain (+ 6.2%). MWF and f followed an approximately linear relationship for regions with MWF <  ~ 10%. For MWF >  ~ 10%, the relationship broke down and f no longer increased in tandem with MWF. For multiple sclerosis patients, MWF and f Z score maps showed overlapping areas of low Z score and similar trends between patients and brain regions, although those of f generally had greater spatial extent and magnitude of severity. These results will guide future choice of myelin-sensitive quantitative MRI and improve interpretation of studies using either myelin imaging approach.

Citing Articles

Exploring subcortical pathology and processing speed in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder with myelin water imaging.

Tsai C, Combes A, McMullen K, Kolind S, Traboulsee A J Neuroimaging. 2024; 35(1):e13250.

PMID: 39511966 PMC: 11625695. DOI: 10.1111/jon.13250.


The CALIPR framework for highly accelerated myelin water imaging with improved precision and sensitivity.

Dvorak A, Kumar D, Zhang J, Gilbert G, Balaji S, Wiley N Sci Adv. 2023; 9(44):eadh9853.

PMID: 37910622 PMC: 10619933. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adh9853.


Study of T2 mapping in quantifying and discriminating uterine lesions under different magnetic field strengths: 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T.

Zhu L, Lu W, Wang F, Wang Y, Wu P, Zhou J BMC Med Imaging. 2023; 23(1):1.

PMID: 36600192 PMC: 9811773. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00960-w.


Advanced spinal cord MRI in multiple sclerosis: Current techniques and future directions.

Combes A, Clarke M, OGrady K, Schilling K, Smith S Neuroimage Clin. 2022; 36:103244.

PMID: 36306717 PMC: 9668663. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103244.


Myelin water imaging in relapsing multiple sclerosis treated with ocrelizumab and interferon beta-1a.

Kolind S, Abel S, Taylor C, Tam R, Laule C, Li D Neuroimage Clin. 2022; 35:103109.

PMID: 35878575 PMC: 9421448. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103109.


References
1.
Graham S, Stanchev P, Bronskill M . Criteria for analysis of multicomponent tissue T2 relaxation data. Magn Reson Med. 1996; 35(3):370-8. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910350315. View

2.
Zhang J, Kolind S, Laule C, MacKay A . Comparison of myelin water fraction from multiecho T2 decay curve and steady-state methods. Magn Reson Med. 2014; 73(1):223-32. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25125. View

3.
Novikov D, Kiselev V, Jespersen S . On modeling. Magn Reson Med. 2018; 79(6):3172-3193. PMC: 5905348. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27101. View

4.
Tustison N, Avants B, Cook P, Zheng Y, Egan A, Yushkevich P . N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010; 29(6):1310-20. PMC: 3071855. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2046908. View

5.
Smith M, Sedgewick L . Studies of the mechanism of demyelination. Regional differences in myelin stability in vitro. J Neurochem. 1975; 24(4):763-70. View