» Articles » PMID: 33419399

Performance on Sit-to-stand Tests in Relation to Measures of Functional Fitness and Sarcopenia Diagnosis in Community-dwelling Older Adults

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2021 Jan 9
PMID 33419399
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The sit-to-stand (STS) test has been deployed as surrogate measures of strength or physical performance in sarcopenia diagnosis. This study examines the relationship of two common STS variants - Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5TSTS) and 30 s Chair Stand Test (30CST) - with grip strength, muscle mass and functional measures, and their impact on sarcopenia prevalence in community-dwelling older adults.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional analysis of 887 community-dwelling adults aged ≥50 years. Participants completed a battery of physical fitness tests - 5TSTS, 30CST, grip strength, gait speed, Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) for dynamic balance and six-minute walk test (6MWT) for cardiorespiratory endurance. Muscle mass was measured using multi-frequency segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). We performed correlation analysis between STS performance and other fitness measures and muscle mass, followed by multiple linear regression for the independent determinants of STS performance.

Results: Mean participant age was 67.3±7 years, with female predominance (72.9%). STS tests exhibited weak correlations with grip strength (30CST, r = 0.290; 5TSTS, r = - 0.242; both p< 0.01), and stronger correlations with gait speed (30CST, r = 0.517; 5TSTS, r = - 0.533; both p< 0.01), endurance (30CST, r = 0.558; 5TSTS, r = - 0.531; both p < 0.01) and dynamic balance (30CST, r = - 0.501; 5TSTS, r = 0.646; both p< 0.01). Muscle mass correlated with grip strength but not STS. In multiple regression analysis, all fitness measures were independently associated with 30CST performance. Performance in both STS tests remained independent of muscle mass. There was no significant difference in prevalence of possible sarcopenia diagnosis using grip strength or STS (30CST, 25.0%; 5TSTS, 22.1%; grip strength, 22.3%; p = 0.276). When both measures are used, prevalence is significantly higher (42.0%; p = 0.276). Prevalence of confirmed sarcopenia with inclusion of muscle mass was significantly lower using STS compared with grip strength (30CST, 4.6%; 5TSTS, 4.1% vs. grip strength, 7.1%; p< 0.05).

Conclusion: In the sarcopenia construct, STS tests better represents muscle physical performance rather than muscle strength. Different subsets of population with possible sarcopenia are identified depending on the test used. The lack of association of STS performance with muscle mass results in a lower prevalence of confirmed sarcopenia compared with grip strength, but may better reflect changes in muscle quality.

Citing Articles

Evaluating handgrip strength and functional tests as indicators of gait speed in older females.

Muollo V, DEmanuele S, Ghiotto L, Rudi D, Schena F, Tarperi C Front Sports Act Living. 2025; 7:1497546.

PMID: 39931735 PMC: 11807956. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1497546.


Validation of Devices for the Five Times Sit To Stand Test: Comparing Plantar Pressure and Head Motion Analysis with Manual Measurement.

Jee S, Jang C, Park K, Shin S, Paek M, Park J Yonsei Med J. 2025; 66(1):51-57.

PMID: 39742885 PMC: 11704245. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0525.


Exploring determinant factors influencing muscle quality and sarcopenia in Bilbao's older adult population through machine learning: A comprehensive analysis approach.

Virto N, Dequin D, Rio X, Mendez-Zorrilla A, Garcia-Zapirain B PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0316174.

PMID: 39739941 PMC: 11687929. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316174.


Assessing Sarcopenia in Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Case Series.

Schofield C, Taaffe D, Newton R, Galvao D, Cohen P, Kim J Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024; 7(8):e2155.

PMID: 39118235 PMC: 11310097. DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.2155.


Evaluation of a Virtual Tai Chi Program for Older Veterans at Risk of Loneliness or Physical Deconditioning: A Quality Improvement Project.

Dawson B, Keller H, Sawyer L, Gorman S, Sabangan J, McPartlin A Geriatrics (Basel). 2024; 9(4).

PMID: 39051255 PMC: 11270295. DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics9040091.


References
1.
Barbat-Artigas S, Rolland Y, Zamboni M, Aubertin-Leheudre M . How to assess functional status: a new muscle quality index. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012; 16(1):67-77. DOI: 10.1007/s12603-012-0004-5. View

2.
Ramirez Torres M, Ruiz Valenzuela R, Esparza-Romero J, Lopez Teros M, Aleman-Mateo H . The fat mass index, not the fat-free mass index, is associated with impaired physical performance in older adult subjects: Evidence from a cross-sectional study. Clin Nutr. 2018; 38(2):877-882. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.02.013. View

3.
Candow D, Chilibeck P . Differences in size, strength, and power of upper and lower body muscle groups in young and older men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005; 60(2):148-56. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/60.2.148. View

4.
Jones C, Rikli R, Beam W . A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999; 70(2):113-9. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1999.10608028. View

5.
Janssen W, Bussmann H, Stam H . Determinants of the sit-to-stand movement: a review. Phys Ther. 2002; 82(9):866-79. View