» Articles » PMID: 38488531

Phase Angle and Impedance Ratio As Indicators of Physical Function and Fear of Falling in Older Adult Women: Cross-Sectional Analysis

Overview
Journal JMIR Aging
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2024 Mar 15
PMID 38488531
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Older adults experience a significant decline in muscle integrity and function with aging. Early detection of decreased muscle quality can pave the way for interventions to mitigate the progression of age-related physical declines. Phase angle (PhA) and impedance ratio (IR) are measures of muscle integrity, which can be assessed quickly via bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and may be indicative of physical function.

Objective: This study aimed to characterize the relationships among handgrip strength (HGS), sit-to-stand (STS), BTrackS balance scores, fear of falling (evaluated using the Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International [Short FES-I]), and IR among community-dwelling older adult women classified as having a low or high PhA.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted with 85 older women (mean age 75.0, SD 7.2 years; mean weight 71.0, SD 15.0 kg; mean height 162.6, SD 6.1 cm). To examine the influence of PhA on performance measures, participants were divided into 2 PhA groups: high (>4.1°; n=56) and low (≤4.1°; n=29). Data were nonnormative; hence, the Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate between-group differences, and Kendall τ coefficients were used to determine the partial correlations.

Results: The low PhA group had a significantly higher IR (mean 0.85, SD 0.03) than the high PhA group (mean 0.81, SD 0.03; r=.92; P<.001). The high PhA group had superior HGS (mean 21.4, SD 6.2 kg; P=.007; r=0.36), BTrackS balance scores (mean 26.6, SD 9.5 cm; P=.03; r=0.30), and STS scores (mean 16.0, SD 5.5; P<.001; r=0.49) than the low PhA group (mean HGS 17.6, SD 4.7 kg; mean BTrackS balance score 37.1, SD 21.1 cm; mean STS score 10.7, SD 6.2). Both PhA and IR were significantly correlated with HGS and BTrackS balance, STS, and Short FES-I scores (P<.05). However, on adjusting for the whole sample's age, only PhA was strongly correlated with HGS (τb=0.75; P=.003) and STS scores (τb=0.76; P=.002). Short FES-I scores were moderately correlated with IR (τb=0.46; P=.07) after controlling for age. No significant between-group differences were observed for height, weight, or BMI.

Conclusions: PhA and IR are associated with physical function and the fear of falling in older women. However, only PhA was significantly associated with physical function (HGS and STS) independent of age. Conversely, only IR was significantly associated with the fear of falling. Diminished physical function and increased IR appear to be characteristics of older women with a PhA of ≤4.1°. These findings suggest that PhA and IR measured through BIA together may serve as a valuable tool for early identification of older women at the risk of functional decline and a heightened fear of falling.

Citing Articles

Whole-Body and Segmental Phase Angles and Cognitive Function in the Older Korean Population: Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Chen J, Park J, Lin C, Lai T, Kim D, Shin M JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024; 10:e63457.

PMID: 39692345 PMC: 11683505. DOI: 10.2196/63457.


Comparing Device-Generated and Calculated Bioimpedance Variables in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Lafontant K, Sterner D, Fukuda D, Stout J, Park J, Thiamwong L Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(17).

PMID: 39275537 PMC: 11397826. DOI: 10.3390/s24175626.

References
1.
Buckinx F, Reginster J, Dardenne N, Croisiser J, Kaux J, Beaudart C . Concordance between muscle mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16:60. PMC: 4369090. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0510-9. View

2.
Unterberger S, Aschauer R, Zohrer P, Draxler A, Aschauer M, Kager B . Association of Bioelectrical Impedance Phase Angle with Physical Performance and Nutrient Intake of Older Adults. Nutrients. 2023; 15(6). PMC: 10057147. DOI: 10.3390/nu15061458. View

3.
Bellido D, Garcia-Garcia C, Talluri A, Lukaski H, Garcia-Almeida J . Future lines of research on phase angle: Strengths and limitations. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2023; 24(3):563-583. PMC: 10090740. DOI: 10.1007/s11154-023-09803-7. View

4.
Oliveira R, Leao C, Silva A, Clemente F, Santamarinha C, Nobari H . Comparisons between Bioelectrical Impedance Variables, Functional Tests and Blood Markers Based on BMI in Older Women and Their Association with Phase Angle. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(11). PMC: 9180009. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116851. View

5.
Cawthon P, Blackwell T, Cauley J, Kado D, Barrett-Connor E, Lee C . Evaluation of the Usefulness of Consensus Definitions of Sarcopenia in Older Men: Results from the Observational Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Cohort Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015; 63(11):2247-59. PMC: 4739621. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13788. View