» Articles » PMID: 33391712

Numerical Response of Predators to Large Variations of Grassland Vole Abundance and Long-term Community Changes

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2021 Jan 4
PMID 33391712
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Voles can reach high densities with multiannual population fluctuations of large amplitude, and they are at the base of predator communities in Northern Eurasia and Northern America. This status places them at the heart of management conflicts wherein crop protection and health concerns are often raised against conservation issues. Here, a 20-year survey describes the effects of large variations in grassland vole populations on the densities and the daily theoretical food intakes (TFI) of vole predators based on roadside counts. Our results show how the predator community responded to prey variations of large amplitude and how it reorganized with the increase in a dominant predator, here the red fox, which likely negatively impacted hare, European wildcat, and domestic cat populations. This population increase did not lead to an increase in the average number of predators present in the study area, suggesting compensations among resident species due to intraguild predation or competition. Large variations in vole predator number could be clearly attributed to the temporary increase in the populations of mobile birds of prey in response to grassland vole outbreaks. Our study provides empirical support for more timely and better focused actions in wildlife management and vole population control, and it supports an evidence-based and constructive dialogue about management targets and options between all stakeholders of such socio-ecosystems.

Citing Articles

Mapping small mammal optimal habitats using satellite-derived proxy variables and species distribution models.

Marston C, Raoul F, Rowland C, Quere J, Feng X, Lin R PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0289209.

PMID: 37590218 PMC: 10434852. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289209.


Numerical response of predators to large variations of grassland vole abundance and long-term community changes.

Giraudoux P, Levret A, Afonso E, Coeurdassier M, Couval G Ecol Evol. 2021; 10(24):14221-14246.

PMID: 33391712 PMC: 7771176. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7020.

References
1.
Raoul F, Michelat D, Ordinaire M, Decote Y, Aubert M, Delattre P . Echinococcus multilocularis: secondary poisoning of fox population during a vole outbreak reduces environmental contamination in a high endemicity area. Int J Parasitol. 2003; 33(9):945-54. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(03)00127-9. View

2.
Morters M, Restif O, Hampson K, Cleaveland S, Wood J, Conlan A . Evidence-based control of canine rabies: a critical review of population density reduction. J Anim Ecol. 2012; 82(1):6-14. PMC: 3579231. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02033.x. View

3.
Korpimaki E, Norrdahl K, Klemola T, Pettersen T, Stenseth N . Dynamic effects of predators on cyclic voles: field experimentation and model extrapolation. Proc Biol Sci. 2002; 269(1495):991-7. PMC: 1690989. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1972. View

4.
Paz A, Jareno D, Arroyo L, Vinuela J, Arroyo B, Mougeot F . Avian predators as a biological control system of common vole (Microtus arvalis) populations in north-western Spain: experimental set-up and preliminary results. Pest Manag Sci. 2012; 69(3):444-50. DOI: 10.1002/ps.3289. View

5.
Molsher R, Newsome A, Newsome T, Dickman C . Mesopredator Management: Effects of Red Fox Control on the Abundance, Diet and Use of Space by Feral Cats. PLoS One. 2017; 12(1):e0168460. PMC: 5222607. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168460. View