» Articles » PMID: 31558762

Weather Influences M. Arvalis Reproduction but Not Population Dynamics in a 17-year Time Series

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Sep 28
PMID 31558762
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rodent outbreaks have plagued European agriculture for centuries, but continue to elude comprehensive explanation. Modelling and empirical work in some cyclic rodent systems suggests that changes in reproductive parameters are partly responsible for observed population dynamics. Using a 17-year time series of Microtus arvalis population abundance and demographic data, we explored the relationship between meteorological conditions (temperature and rainfall), female reproductive activity, and population growth rates in a non-cyclic population of this grassland vole species. We found strong but complex relationships between female reproduction and climate variables, with spring female reproduction depressed after cold winters. Population growth rates were, however, uncorrelated with either weather conditions (current and up to three months prior) or with female reproduction (number of foetuses per female and/or proportion of females reproductively active in the population). These results, coupled with age-structure data, suggest that mortality, via predation, disease, or a combination of the two, are responsible for the large multi-annual but non-cyclic population dynamics observed in this population of the common vole.

Citing Articles

Weak coupling between energetic status and the timing of reproduction in an Arctic ungulate.

Tyler N, Post E, Hazlerigg D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):6352.

PMID: 38491083 PMC: 11322327. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56550-z.


Mapping small mammal optimal habitats using satellite-derived proxy variables and species distribution models.

Marston C, Raoul F, Rowland C, Quere J, Feng X, Lin R PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0289209.

PMID: 37590218 PMC: 10434852. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289209.


Abundance and Population Structure of Small Rodents in Fruit and Berry Farms.

Balciauskas L, Stirke V, Balciauskiene L Life (Basel). 2023; 13(2).

PMID: 36836730 PMC: 9959164. DOI: 10.3390/life13020375.


Differential temperature effects on photoperiodism in female voles: A possible explanation for declines in vole populations.

van Rosmalen L, Riedstra B, Beemster N, Dijkstra C, Hut R Mol Ecol. 2022; 31(12):3360-3373.

PMID: 35398940 PMC: 9325516. DOI: 10.1111/mec.16467.


Classification of airborne multispectral imagery to quantify common vole impacts on an agricultural field.

Plaza J, Sanchez N, Garcia-Ariza C, Perez-Sanchez R, Charfole F, Caminero-Saldana C Pest Manag Sci. 2022; 78(6):2316-2323.

PMID: 35243753 PMC: 9313580. DOI: 10.1002/ps.6857.


References
1.
Maas M, de Vries A, van Roon A, Takumi K, Van der Giessen J, Rockx B . High Prevalence of Tula Hantavirus in Common Voles in The Netherlands. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017; 17(3):200-205. DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2016.1995. View

2.
Minichova L, Hamsikova Z, Mahrikova L, Slovak M, Kocianova E, Kazimirova M . Molecular evidence of Rickettsia spp. in ixodid ticks and rodents in suburban, natural and rural habitats in Slovakia. Parasit Vectors. 2017; 10(1):158. PMC: 5366151. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2094-8. View

3.
Hamsikova Z, Coipan C, Mahrikova L, Minichova L, Sprong H, Kazimirova M . Borrelia miyamotoi and Co-Infection with Borrelia afzelii in Ixodes ricinus Ticks and Rodents from Slovakia. Microb Ecol. 2016; 73(4):1000-1008. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-016-0918-2. View

4.
Villette P, Afonso E, Couval G, Levret A, Galan M, Tatard C . Consequences of organ choice in describing bacterial pathogen assemblages in a rodent population. Epidemiol Infect. 2017; 145(14):3070-3075. PMC: 9152748. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268817001893. View

5.
Begon M, Telfer S, Burthe S, Lambin X, Smith M, Paterson S . Effects of abundance on infection in natural populations: field voles and cowpox virus. Epidemics. 2011; 1(1):35-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2008.10.001. View