» Articles » PMID: 33349274

A New Method for Quantitative Assessment of Hand Muscle Volume and Fat in Magnetic Resonance Images

Overview
Journal BMC Rheumatol
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2020 Dec 22
PMID 33349274
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by systemic inflammation and bone and muscle loss. Recent research showed that obesity facilitates inflammation, but it is unknown if obesity also increases the risk or severity of RA. Further research requires an accurate quantification of muscle volume and fat content.

Methods: The aim was to develop a reproducible (semi) automated method for hand muscle segmentation and quantification of hand muscle fat content and to reduce the time consuming efforts of manual segmentation. T1 weighted scans were used for muscle segmentation based on a random forest classifier. Optimal segmentation parameters were determined by cross validation with 30 manually segmented hand datasets (gold standard). An operator reviewed the automatically created segmentation and applied corrections if necessary. For fat quantification, the segmentation masks were automatically transferred to MRI Dixon sequences by rigid registration. In total 76 datasets from RA patients were analyzed. Accuracy was validated against the manual gold standard segmentations.

Results: Average analysis time per dataset was 10 min, more than 10 times faster compared to manual outlining. All 76 datasets could be analyzed and were accurate as judged by a clinical expert. 69 datasets needed minor manual segmentation corrections. Segmentation accuracy compared to the gold standard (Dice ratio 0.98 ± 0.04, average surface distance 0.04 ± 0.10 mm) and reanalysis precision were excellent. Intra- and inter-operator precision errors were below 0.3% (muscle) and 0.7% (fat). Average Hausdorff distances were higher (1.09 mm), but high values originated from a shift of the analysis VOI by one voxel in scan direction.

Conclusions: We presented a novel semi-automated method for quantitative assessment of hand muscles with excellent accuracy and operator precision, which highly reduced a traditional manual segmentation effort. This method may greatly facilitate further MRI image based muscle research of the hands.

Citing Articles

Fully-automated segmentation of muscle and inter-/intra-muscular fat from magnetic resonance images of calves and thighs: an open-source workflow in Python.

Tam K, Liu S, Costa S, Szabo E, Reitsma S, Gillick H Skelet Muscle. 2024; 14(1):37.

PMID: 39731189 PMC: 11674188. DOI: 10.1186/s13395-024-00365-z.


Update on muscle imaging in myositis.

Tan A, Di Matteo A, Wakefield R, Biglands J Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2023; 35(6):395-403.

PMID: 37656661 PMC: 10552815. DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000975.


Advancing frontiers in rheumatic and musculoskeletal imaging.

Albano D, Carubbi F BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):227.

PMID: 33641666 PMC: 7919318. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04101-2.

References
1.
Kauranen K, Vuotikka P, Hakala M . Motor performance of the hand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000; 59(10):812-6. PMC: 1753004. DOI: 10.1136/ard.59.10.812. View

2.
Ghatas M, Lester R, Khan M, Gorgey A . Semi-automated segmentation of magnetic resonance images for thigh skeletal muscle and fat using threshold technique after spinal cord injury. Neural Regen Res. 2018; 13(10):1787-1795. PMC: 6128057. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.238623. View

3.
Cuingnet R, Prevost R, Lesage D, Cohen L, Mory B, Ardon R . Automatic detection and segmentation of kidneys in 3D CT images using random forests. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2013; 15(Pt 3):66-74. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33454-2_9. View

4.
Ferrante Jr A . Obesity-induced inflammation: a metabolic dialogue in the language of inflammation. J Intern Med. 2007; 262(4):408-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01852.x. View

5.
Kang Y, Engelke K, Kalender W . Interactive 3D editing tools for image segmentation. Med Image Anal. 2003; 8(1):35-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2003.07.002. View