» Articles » PMID: 7492865

Accurate Assessment of Precision Errors: How to Measure the Reproducibility of Bone Densitometry Techniques

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 1995 Jan 1
PMID 7492865
Citations 349
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Assessment of precision errors in bone mineral densitometry is important for characterization of a technique's ability to detect longitudinal skeletal changes. Short-term and long-term precision errors should be calculated as root-mean-square (RMS) averages of standard deviations of repeated measurements (SD) and standard errors of the estimate of changes in bone density with time (SEE), respectively. Inadequate adjustment for degrees of freedom and use of arithmetic means instead of RMS averages may cause underestimation of true imprecision by up to 41% and 25% (for duplicate measurements), respectively. Calculation of confidence intervals of precision errors based on the number of repeated measurements and the number of subjects assessed serves to characterize limitations of precision error assessments. Provided that precision error are comparable across subjects, examinations with a total of 27 degrees of freedom result in an upper 90% confidence limit of +30% of the mean precision error, a level considered sufficient for characterizing technique imprecision. We recommend three (or four) repeated measurements per individual in a subject group of at least 14 individuals to characterize short-term (or long-term) precision of a technique.

Citing Articles

Precision Errors of Lower Leg Measurement by pQCT in Children With Medical Conditions: Bone Density, Mass, Dimensions, Mechanostat Parameters and Soft Tissue Composition.

Jaworski M, Kobylinska M J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2025; 25(1):18-28.

PMID: 40024224 PMC: 11880848. DOI: 10.22540/JMNI-25-018.


3D convolutional deep learning for nonlinear estimation of body composition from whole body morphology.

Tian I, Liu J, Wong M, Kelly N, Liu Y, Garber A NPJ Digit Med. 2025; 8(1):79.

PMID: 39894882 PMC: 11788428. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-025-01469-6.


Bone imaging modality precision and agreement between DXA, pQCT, and HR-pQCT.

Mesinovic J, Breasail M, Burt L, Shore-Lorenti C, Zebaze R, Lim C JBMR Plus. 2025; 9(2):ziae158.

PMID: 39845981 PMC: 11752644. DOI: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae158.


Cervicothoracic volumetric bone mineral density assessed by opportunistic QCT may be a reliable marker for osteoporosis in adults.

Ramschutz C, Sollmann N, El Husseini M, Kupfer K, Paprottka K, Loffler M Osteoporos Int. 2024; 36(3):423-433.

PMID: 39738830 PMC: 11882693. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07373-1.


Smartphone three-dimensional imaging for body composition assessment using non-rigid avatar reconstruction.

Tinsley G, Rodriguez C, Florez C, Siedler M, Tinoco E, McCarthy C Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1485450.

PMID: 39434777 PMC: 11491362. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1485450.


References
1.
Gluer C, Vahlensieck M, Faulkner K, Engelke K, Black D, Genant H . Site-matched calcaneal measurements of broad-band ultrasound attenuation and single X-ray absorptiometry: do they measure different skeletal properties?. J Bone Miner Res. 1992; 7(9):1071-9. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650070910. View

2.
Nilas L, Christiansen C . Rates of bone loss in normal women: evidence of accelerated trabecular bone loss after the menopause. Eur J Clin Invest. 1988; 18(5):529-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1988.tb01052.x. View

3.
Schneider P, Borner W, Mazess R, BARDEN H . The relationship of peripheral to axial bone density. Bone Miner. 1988; 4(3):279-87. View

4.
Gluer C, Steiger P, Selvidge R, Hayashi C, Genant H . Comparative assessment of dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy radiography. Radiology. 1990; 174(1):223-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.174.1.2294552. View

5.
Block J, Smith R, Glueer C, Steiger P, Ettinger B, Genant H . Models of spinal trabecular bone loss as determined by quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. 1989; 4(2):249-57. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650040218. View