» Articles » PMID: 33295110

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of the EXTREME Regimen for Treating Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Older and Younger Adult Patients

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Dec 9
PMID 33295110
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a geriatric cancer. However, older adult patients are frequently underrepresented in large clinical trials.

Aims: The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the EXTREME regimen (platinum + fluorouracil + cetuximab) in older and younger adult patients with HNSCC.

Methods And Results: Patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC treated with the EXTREME regimen were retrospectively analyzed. We compare the efficacy and safety in older (aged ≥70 years) younger (aged <70 years) adult patients. Of the 86 patients examined in this study, 21 (24.4%) were older adults. There was no difference in overall response rate (46.9% vs 38.5%, P = .76), median progression-free survival [5.7 months vs 5.8 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.52-1.51, P = .66] and overall survival (OS) (14.6 months vs 15.2 months, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.43-1.43, P = .44) in younger vs older patients. There was also no difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events between groups. The exploratory analysis for geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) showed the association with lower GNRI (≤98) and poor OS in older adult patients (37.7 months vs 7.0 months, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.89, P = .002).

Conclusions: The EXTREME regimen with optimal dose modification is safe and effective for both older and younger adult patients with HNSCC. The GNRI can be an indicator to select the older adult patients who can get benefit from the EXTREME regimen.

Citing Articles

Prognostic role of geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and controlling nutritional status (CONUT) on outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Huang Y, Chen S, Chiang Y BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):242.

PMID: 39934700 PMC: 11817134. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13565-7.


First-line pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: 5-year follow-up of the Japanese population of KEYNOTE‑048.

Oridate N, Takahashi S, Tanaka K, Shimizu Y, Fujimoto Y, Matsumoto K Int J Clin Oncol. 2024; 29(12):1825-1839.

PMID: 39382718 PMC: 11588814. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02632-x.


Efficacy of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index for Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Yiu C, Liu C, Wu J, Tsai W, Liu P, Cheng W Nutrients. 2023; 15(20).

PMID: 37892423 PMC: 10610298. DOI: 10.3390/nu15204348.


Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in a Real-world Setting in Japan.

Manako T, Yasumatsu R, Nakano T, Matsuo M, Takeuchi T, Taura M In Vivo. 2023; 37(2):747-755.

PMID: 36881083 PMC: 10026669. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13137.


Comparison of the efficacy and safety of the EXTREME regimen for treating recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in older and younger adult patients.

Fukuda N, Yunokawa M, Fujiwara Y, Wang X, Ohmoto A, Hayashi N Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2020; 4(2):e1322.

PMID: 33295110 PMC: 8451378. DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1322.

References
1.
Bang Y, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung H, Shen L, Sawaki A . Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010; 376(9742):687-97. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X. View

2.
Argiris A, Li Y, Murphy B, Langer C, Forastiere A . Outcome of elderly patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(2):262-8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.039. View

3.
Bouillanne O, Morineau G, Dupont C, Coulombel I, Vincent J, Nicolis I . Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index: a new index for evaluating at-risk elderly medical patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 82(4):777-83. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/82.4.777. View

4.
Neve M, Jameson M, Govender S, Hartopeanu C . Impact of geriatric assessment on the management of older adults with head and neck cancer: A pilot study. J Geriatr Oncol. 2016; 7(6):457-462. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.05.006. View

5.
Leemans C, Braakhuis B, Brakenhoff R . The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010; 11(1):9-22. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2982. View