» Articles » PMID: 33294805

Comparative Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of Dolutegravir and Efavirenz 400mg Among Antiretroviral Therapies for First-line HIV Treatment: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: To inform World Health Organization (WHO) global guidelines, we updated and expanded the evidence base to assess the comparative efficacy, tolerability, and safety of first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens.

Methods: We searched Embase, Medline and CENTRAL on 28 February 2020 to update the systematic literature review of clinical trials comparing recommended first-line ART that informed previous WHO guidelines. Outcomes included viral suppression, change in CD4 cell counts, mortality, serious and overall adverse events (AEs), discontinuation, discontinuations due to AEs (DAEs); and new outcomes: drug-resistance, neuropsychiatric AEs, early viral suppression, weight gain and birth outcomes. Comparative effects were assessed through network meta-analyses and certainty in the evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework.

Findings: We identified 156 publications pertaining to 68 trials for the primary population. Relative to efavirenz, dolutegravir had improved odds of viral suppression across all time points (odds ratio [OR]: 1·94; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 1·48-2·56 at 96 weeks); was protective of drug-resistance (OR: 0·13; 95%CrI: 0·04-0·48); and led to fewer discontinuations (OR: 0·58; 95%CrI: 0·48-0·70). Evidence supported dolutegravir use among TB-HIV co-infected persons and pregnant women. Adverse birth outcomes were observed in 33.2% of dolutegravir-managed pregnancies and 35.0% of efavirenz-managed pregnancies. Low-dose efavirenz had comparable efficacy and safety to standard-dose efavirenz, but led to fewer DAEs (OR: 0·70; 95%CrI: 0·50-0·92).

Interpretation: The evidence supports choosing dolutegravir in combination with lamivudine/emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate as the preferred first-line regimen and low-dose efavirenz-based regimens as an alternative. Dolutegravir can be considered to be effective, safe and tolerable.

Funding: WHO.

Citing Articles

Brief communication: virological outcomes and dolutegravir resistance mutations in HIV-infected patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study in Mozambique.

Doro Altan A, Majid N, Orlando S, Uamusse E, Rafael M, Sidumo Z AIDS Res Ther. 2025; 22(1):8.

PMID: 39885593 PMC: 11784004. DOI: 10.1186/s12981-025-00708-w.


Body weight changes in people with HIV starting dolutegravir versus efavirenz-based regimens in a large cohort in rural Tanzania.

Weisser M, Mapesi H, Vanobberghen F, Okuma J, Eichenberger A, Wilson H AIDS. 2024; 39(4):362-372.

PMID: 39632712 PMC: 11872259. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004085.


Pretreatment and acquired HIV drug resistance in Belize-results of nationally representative surveys, 2021-22.

Morey F, Giron-Callejas A, Manzanero R, Urbina A, Garcia-Morales C, Joseph J J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024; 80(1):292-300.

PMID: 39556256 PMC: 11695872. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkae408.


Comparative Effects of Efavirenz and Dolutegravir on Metabolomic and Inflammatory Profiles, and Platelet Activation of People Living with HIV: A Pilot Study.

Roux C, Mason S, du Toit L, Nel J, Rossouw T, Steel H Viruses. 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 39339938 PMC: 11437493. DOI: 10.3390/v16091462.


Risk of Congenital Anomalies with Dolutegravir-Based Anti-retroviral Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Payra S, Harsha D, Kumar K, Manjhi P, Singh S, Kumar R Clin Drug Investig. 2024; 44(9):667-685.

PMID: 39302585 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-024-01390-y.


References
1.
Molina J, Squires K, Sax P, Cahn P, Lombaard J, DeJesus E . Doravirine versus ritonavir-boosted darunavir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 (DRIVE-FORWARD): 48-week results of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet HIV. 2018; 5(5):e211-e220. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30021-3. View

2.
Guyatt G, Oxman A, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P . GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008; 336(7650):924-6. PMC: 2335261. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. View

3.
Stellbrink H, Reynes J, Lazzarin A, Voronin E, Pulido F, Felizarta F . Dolutegravir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1: 96-week results from a randomized dose-ranging study. AIDS. 2013; 27(11):1771-8. PMC: 3694319. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283612419. View

4.
Bucher H, Guyatt G, Griffith L, Walter S . The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50(6):683-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00049-8. View

5.
Guyatt G, Oxman A, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl E, Alonso-Coello P . GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64(12):1311-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004. View