» Articles » PMID: 21802902

GRADE Guidelines: 9. Rating Up the Quality of Evidence

Abstract

The most common reason for rating up the quality of evidence is a large effect. GRADE suggests considering rating up quality of evidence one level when methodologically rigorous observational studies show at least a two-fold reduction or increase in risk, and rating up two levels for at least a five-fold reduction or increase in risk. Systematic review authors and guideline developers may also consider rating up quality of evidence when a dose-response gradient is present, and when all plausible confounders or biases would decrease an apparent treatment effect, or would create a spurious effect when results suggest no effect. Other considerations include the rapidity of the response, the underlying trajectory of the condition, and indirect evidence.

Citing Articles

Chemotherapy with Alkylating Agents and Dental Anomalies in Children: A Systematic Review.

Gallenzi P, Malatesta A, Staderini E, Guglielmi F J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941698 PMC: 11818895. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14031030.


Bidirectional association between breast cancer and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Bao F, Yu L, Zhang X, Mu Q PeerJ. 2025; 13:e18888.

PMID: 39902325 PMC: 11789662. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18888.


Nutrition users' guides: systematic reviews part 1 -structured guide for methodological assessment, interpretation and application of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of non-randomised nutritional epidemiology studies.

Zeraatkar D, de Souza R, Guyatt G, Bala M, Alonso-Coello P, Johnston B BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2025; 7(2):e000835.

PMID: 39882294 PMC: 11773667. DOI: 10.1136/bmjnph-2023-000835.


The effect of audio distraction in reducing signs of stress and anxiety during pediatric dental treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ramirez I, Reis C, Madalena I, Baratto Filho F, Oliveira M, Antunes L Clin Oral Investig. 2025; 29(1):58.

PMID: 39804393 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-06035-0.


Association between individual urinary iodine concentrations in pregnant women and maternal/newborn outcomes.

Bolfi F, Marum M, Fonseca S, Mazeto G, Nogueira C, Nunes-Nogueira V Endocr Connect. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39804211 PMC: 11799753. DOI: 10.1530/EC-24-0621.