» Articles » PMID: 33280277

Two Year Outcome in Nonagenarians Undergoing Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair

Overview
Journal ESC Heart Fail
Date 2020 Dec 6
PMID 33280277
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) has emerged as standard treatment in selected patients with clinically relevant mitral regurgitation (MR) and increased surgical risk. We aimed to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes in nonagenarians undergoing PMVR.

Methods And Results: Altogether, 493 patients with severe MR who were treated with PMVR were included in this open-label prospective study and followed up for 2 years. We treated 25 patients with PMVR aged 90 years or above, 185 patients aged 80-89 years, and 283 patients aged <80 years. PMVR in nonagenarians was safe and did not differ from PMVR in younger patients in terms of safety endpoints. Device success did not differ among the groups (100% in nonagenarians, 95.7% in octogenarians, and 95.1% in septuagenarians, P = 0.100). Unadjusted 2 year mortality was 28% in nonagenarians, 32.4% in octogenarians, and 19.8% in septuagenarians (P = 0.008). Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed similar 2 year survival in the nonagenarian and octogenarian groups (P = 0.657). In the multivariate analysis, age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.031, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.002-1.060, P = 0.034], higher post-procedural transmitral valve gradients (HR 1.187, 95% CI 1.104-1.277, P = 0.001), and post-procedural acute kidney injury (HR 2.360, 95% CI 1.431-3.893, P = 0.001) were independent predictors of 2 year mortality. Altogether, 89.4% of the nonagenarians, 85.9% of the octogenarians, and 86.4% of the septuagenarians had MR grade of 2+ or less at 1 year after PMVR (P = 0.910). New York Heart Association functional class improved in the vast majority of patients, irrespective of age (P = 0.129). After 1 year, 9.5% of the nonagenarians, 22.3% of the octogenarians, and 25.2% of the septuagenarians (each P = 0.001 compared with baseline) suffered from New York Heart Association Functional Class III or IV. The rate of heart failure rehospitalization in the first 12 months after PMVR did not differ among the groups (16% in the nonagenarians, 16.7% in the octogenarians, and 17.7% in the septuagenarians) (P = 0.954). Quality of life assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire before and at 1 year after PMVR improved in all age groups (P = 0.001).

Conclusions: Percutaneous mitral valve repair in carefully selected nonagenarians is feasible and safe with intermediate-term beneficial effects comparable with those in younger patients.

Citing Articles

Comparison of costs associated with transcatheter mitral valve repair: PASCAL vs MitraClip in a real-world setting.

Haurand J, Haschemi J, Oehler D, Heinen Y, Polzin A, Kelm M BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):945.

PMID: 37667270 PMC: 10476289. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09966-8.


Improved mid-term stability of MR reduction with an increased number of clips after percutaneous mitral valve repair in functional MR.

Sauter R, Lin C, Magunia H, Schreieck J, Durschmied D, Gawaz M Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2023; 45:101190.

PMID: 36941997 PMC: 10024191. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101190.


Transcatheter mitral valve repair is feasible and effective in oldest-old patients: results from real-world cohort.

Alachkar M, Kirschfink A, Alnaimi A, Schroder J, Vogt F, Marx N J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022; 19(10):761-767.

PMID: 36338281 PMC: 9618849. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.10.004.


Transcatheter mitral valve repair in nonagenarians.

Cepas-Guillen P, Pascual I, Garcia E, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Jurado-Roman A, Benito-Gonzalez T J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022; 19(1):90-94.

PMID: 35233227 PMC: 8832046. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.01.007.


Two year outcome in nonagenarians undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair.

Christidi A, Haschemi J, Spieker M, Bonner F, Kelm M, Westenfeld R ESC Heart Fail. 2020; 8(1):577-585.

PMID: 33280277 PMC: 7835616. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13127.

References
1.
Elbadawi A, Elgendy I, Megaly M, Saad M, Garcia S, Abbott J . Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Among Nonagenarians. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 13(11):1385-1387. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.026. View

2.
Hommos M, Glassock R, Rule A . Structural and Functional Changes in Human Kidneys with Healthy Aging. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017; 28(10):2838-2844. PMC: 5619977. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2017040421. View

3.
Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax J, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm P . 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38(36):2739-2791. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391. View

4.
Spieker M, Hellhammer K, Katsianos S, Wiora J, Zeus T, Horn P . Effect of Acute Kidney Injury After Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair on Outcome. Am J Cardiol. 2018; 122(2):316-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.358. View

5.
Metze C, Matzik A, Scherner M, Korber M, Michels G, Baldus S . Impact of Frailty on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10(19):1920-1929. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.042. View