» Articles » PMID: 33239105

Advancing the Global Physical Activity Agenda: Recommendations for Future Research by the 2020 WHO Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Guidelines Development Group

Abstract

Background: In July, 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) commenced work to update the 2010 Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health and established a Guideline Development Group (GDG) comprising expert public health scientists and practitioners to inform the drafting of the 2020 Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior. The overall task of the GDG was to review the scientific evidence and provide expert advice to the WHO on the amount of physical activity and sedentary behavior associated with optimal health in children and adolescents, adults, older adults (> 64 years), and also specifically in pregnant and postpartum women and people living with chronic conditions or disabilities.

Methods: The GDG reviewed the available evidence specific to each sub-population using systematic protocols and in doing so, identified a number of gaps in the existing literature. These proposed research gaps were discussed and verified by expert consensus among the entire GDG.

Results: Evidence gaps across population sub-groups included a lack of information on: 1) the precise shape of the dose-response curve between physical activity and/or sedentary behavior and several of the health outcomes studied; 2) the health benefits of light-intensity physical activity and of breaking up sedentary time with light-intensity activity; 3) differences in the health effects of different types and domains of physical activity (leisure-time; occupational; transportation; household; education) and of sedentary behavior (occupational; screen time; television viewing); and 4) the joint association between physical activity and sedentary time with health outcomes across the life course. In addition, we acknowledge the need to conduct more population-based studies in low- and middle-income countries and in people living with disabilities and/or chronic disease, and to identify how various sociodemographic factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status) modify the health effects of physical activity, in order to address global health disparities.

Conclusions: Although the 2020 WHO Guidelines for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior were informed by the most up-to-date research on the health effects of physical activity and sedentary time, there is still substantial work to be done in advancing the global physical activity agenda.

Citing Articles

Associations of triglyceride glucose-body mass index and the combination of sedentary behavior and physical activity with risks of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction: a cohort study from the UK biobank.

Zhu Y, Yao T, Tian L, Zhang Y, Ke Q Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025; 24(1):102.

PMID: 40025584 PMC: 11871674. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-025-02652-5.


Association of Dietary Intake with Chronic Disease and Human Health.

Tafuri D, Latino F Nutrients. 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39940304 PMC: 11821025. DOI: 10.3390/nu17030446.


The performance of a machine learning model in predicting accelerometer-derived walking speed.

Logacjov A, Ludvigsen T, Bach K, Kongsvold A, Flaaten M, Nilsen T Heliyon. 2025; 11(2):e42185.

PMID: 39925351 PMC: 11804687. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42185.


How do doctors manage physical activity advocacy for patients and their own self-care? A qualitative interview study of general practitioners in Ireland.

Baky I, Bourke A, Byrne C, MacDonagh J, Clifford A, Niranjan V BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e084301.

PMID: 39900412 PMC: 11795391. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084301.


Sitting time at work and cardiovascular disease risk-a longitudinal analysis of the Study on Mental Health at Work (S-MGA).

Schmidt N, Romero Starke K, Sauter M, Burr H, Seidler A, Hegewald J Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2025; 98(1):119-133.

PMID: 39841190 PMC: 11807066. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-024-02118-3.


References
1.
Mygind L, Kjeldsted E, Hartmeyer R, Mygind E, Bolling M, Bentsen P . Mental, physical and social health benefits of immersive nature-experience for children and adolescents: A systematic review and quality assessment of the evidence. Health Place. 2019; 58:102136. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.05.014. View

2.
Beetham K, Giles C, Noetel M, Clifton V, Jones J, Naughton G . The effects of vigorous intensity exercise in the third trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19(1):281. PMC: 6686535. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2441-1. View

3.
Poitras V, Gray C, Borghese M, Carson V, Chaput J, Janssen I . Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016; 41(6 Suppl 3):S197-239. DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0663. View

4.
Ohkawara K, Oshima Y, Hikihara Y, Ishikawa-Takata K, Tabata I, Tanaka S . Real-time estimation of daily physical activity intensity by a triaxial accelerometer and a gravity-removal classification algorithm. Br J Nutr. 2011; 105(11):1681-91. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114510005441. View

5.
Troiano R, Stamatakis E, Bull F . How can global physical activity surveillance adapt to evolving physical activity guidelines? Needs, challenges and future directions. Br J Sports Med. 2020; 54(24):1468-1473. PMC: 7719905. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102621. View