» Articles » PMID: 33233466

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: What Have Animal Models Taught Us?

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Nov 25
PMID 33233466
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Studies have estimated that currently 344 million people worldwide and 16.4 million adults in the US have some form of dry eye disease (DED). It is believed that approximately 70% of DED cases are due to some form of evaporative dry eye, for which Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is the major cause. Unfortunately, currently there is no effective treatment for MGD, and solely palliative care is available. Given the importance of MGD in DED, there has been a growing interest in studying Meibomian gland development, homeostasis and pathology, and, also, in developing therapies for treating and/or preventing MGD. For such, animal models have shown to be a vital tool. Much of what is known today about the Meibomian gland and MGD was learnt from these important animal models. In particular, canine and rabbit models have been essential for studying the physiopathology and progression of DED, and the mouse model, which includes different knockout strains, has enabled the identification of specific pathways potentially involved in MGD. Herein, we provide a bibliographic review on the various animal models that have been used to study Meibomian gland development, Meibomian gland homeostasis and MGD, primarily focusing on publications between 2000 and 2020.

Citing Articles

Identification of Meibomian gland stem cell populations and mechanisms of aging.

Zhu X, Xu M, Portal C, Lin Y, Ferdinand A, Peng T Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1663.

PMID: 39955307 PMC: 11830078. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56907-6.


Alkali burn injury model of meibomian gland dysfunction in mice.

Li Y, Yang Y, Lin Y, Yan K, Lyu Y, Zhang Z Int J Ophthalmol. 2024; 17(12):2158-2166.

PMID: 39697880 PMC: 11589446. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2024.12.02.


International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria (INHAND): Nonproliferative and Proliferative Lesions of Nonrodent Ocular Tissues.

Schafer K, Atzpodien E, Bach U, Bartoe J, Booler H, Brassard J Toxicol Pathol. 2024; 52(7):368-455.

PMID: 39658869 PMC: 11834351. DOI: 10.1177/01926233241283708.


Association between statin use and dry eye disease in patients with hyperlipidemia: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

Wang Y, Liu S, Lin G, Huang E, Keller J, Wang L Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 17(10):e70039.

PMID: 39356083 PMC: 11445710. DOI: 10.1111/cts.70039.


Identification of Meibomian gland stem cell populations and mechanisms of aging.

Zhu X, Xu M, Portal C, Lin Y, Ferdinand A, Peng T bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39149265 PMC: 11326261. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.09.607015.


References
1.
Modulo C, Machado Filho E, Malki L, Dias A, Cristina de Souza J, Oliveira H . The role of dyslipidemia on ocular surface, lacrimal and meibomian gland structure and function. Curr Eye Res. 2012; 37(4):300-8. DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2011.631720. View

2.
Gesteira T, Sun M, Coulson-Thomas Y, Yamaguchi Y, Yeh L, Hascall V . Hyaluronan Rich Microenvironment in the Limbal Stem Cell Niche Regulates Limbal Stem Cell Differentiation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017; 58(11):4407-4421. PMC: 5584473. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-22326. View

3.
Sullivan B, Evans J, Dana M, Sullivan D . Influence of aging on the polar and neutral lipid profiles in human meibomian gland secretions. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006; 124(9):1286-92. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.124.9.1286. View

4.
Sullivan D, Jensen R, Suzuki T, Richards S . Do sex steroids exert sex-specific and/or opposite effects on gene expression in lacrimal and meibomian glands?. Mol Vis. 2009; 15:1553-72. PMC: 2728565. View

5.
Korsensky L, Ron D . Regulation of FGF signaling: Recent insights from studying positive and negative modulators. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016; 53:101-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.023. View