» Articles » PMID: 33205358

Controlled Hatching at the Prescribed Site Using Femtosecond Laser for Zona Pellucida Drilling at the Early Blastocyst Stage

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2020 Nov 18
PMID 33205358
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To study whether the application of femtosecond laser pulses for zona pellucida (ZP) drilling of blastocysts at the embryonic or abembryonic poles can promote hatching to start immediately through the hole formed and ensure high hatching rates and embryo viability.

Methods: Mouse blastocyst (E3.5) ZP were microdissected with femtosecond laser pulses (514-nm wavelength, 280-fs pulse duration, 2.5-kHz repetition rate) close to the trophoblast or inner cell mass (ICM). The sizes of the holes formed were in the range of 4.5-8.5 μm. Additional longitudinal incisions (5-7-μm long) on either side of the hole were created to determine whether hatching had started at the correct position. Embryos post-laser-assisted ZP drilling and intact embryos were cultured under standard conditions for 2 days; embryo quality was assessed twice daily. The hatching rates and in vitro and in vivo implantation rates (only for embryos with ZP dissected close to the ICM) were estimated.

Results: Femtosecond laser-assisted ZP drilling at the early blastocyst stage facilitated embryo hatching to start at the artificial opening with probability approaching 100%. Despite the artificial opening's small size, no embryo trapping during hatching was observed. Both experimental groups had higher hatching rates than the control groups (93.3-94.7% vs. 83.3-85.7%, respectively). The in vitro implantation rate was comparable with that of the control group (92.3% vs. 95.4%). No statistically significant differences were obtained in the in vivo implantation rates between the experimental and control groups.

Conclusions: Blastocyst-stage femtosecond laser microsurgery of ZP is fast and delicate and enables the hatching process to be initiated in a controlled manner through a relatively small opening, with no embryo trapping.

Citing Articles

Gene expression changes in blastocyst hatching affect embryo implantation success in mice.

An L, Zhang L, Wu Y, Teng Y, Liu Z, Ma M Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025; 13:1496298.

PMID: 39981099 PMC: 11839805. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1496298.


Influencing factors of polyspermy during in vitro fertilization with antagonist protocol.

Shi H, Song Q, Liu J, Li C, Liu R Pak J Med Sci. 2025; 41(2):575-579.

PMID: 39926680 PMC: 11803792. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.41.2.9832.


From Zygote to Blastocyst: Application of Ultrashort Lasers in the Field of Assisted Reproduction and Developmental Biology.

Ilina I, Sitnikov D Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(10).

PMID: 34679594 PMC: 8534476. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11101897.

References
1.
Davidson L, Liu Y, Griffiths T, Jones C, Coward K . Laser technology in the ART laboratory: a narrative review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019; 38(5):725-739. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.011. View

2.
Schopper B, Ludwig M, Edenfeld J, Al-Hasani S, Diedrich K . Possible applications of lasers in assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14 Suppl 1:186-93. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.suppl_1.186. View

3.
Ebner T, Yaman C, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Hartl J, Tews G . Laser assisted immobilization of spermatozoa prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection in humans. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(12):2628-31. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.12.2628. View

4.
Rienzi L, Greco E, Ubaldi F, Iacobelli M, Martinez F, Tesarik J . Laser-assisted intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2001; 76(5):1045-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02861-8. View

5.
Demirol A, Benkhalifa M, Sari T, Gurgan T . Use of laser-assisted intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients with a history of poor ICSI outcome and limited metaphase II oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2006; 86(1):256-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.078. View