Functional Age Predicted by Electronic Short Physical Performance Battery Can Detect Frailty Status in Older Adults
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: The importance of evaluating frailty status of older adults in clinical practice has been gaining attention with cumulative evidence showing its relevance in clinical outcomes and decision-making. We aimed to develop and validate whether the functional age predicted by an electronic continuous short physical performance battery (eSPPB) could predict frailty status.
Patients And Methods: We reviewed medical records of outpatients (N=834) of Asan Medical Center, aged 51-95 years. We used the eSPPB data of 717 patients as a development cohort, and that of 117 patients, who also underwent comprehensive geriatric assessments, as a validation cohort. Frailty index was calculated by counting deficits of 45 geriatric items including comorbidities, daily functions, mobility, mood, and cognition. For functional age, we used balance score (0-4), gait speed (m/s), and stand-up time (s) measured 5 times in the chair rise test.
Results: From the development cohort, we established a functional age using the formula (83.61 - 1.98*[balance score] - 5.21*[gait speed] + 0.23*[stand-up time]), by multivariate linear regression analysis with chronological age as a dependent variable (R = 0.233). In the validation cohort, the functional age positively correlated with frailty index (p < 0.001). C-statistics classifying frailty (defined as frailty index ≥0.25) was higher (p < 0.001) with functional age (0.912) than that with chronological age (0.637). A cut-off functional age of ≥77.2 years maximized Youden's J when screening for frailty, with sensitivity of 94.4% and specificity of 80.8%.
Conclusion: A newly developed functional age predictor using eSPPB parameters can predict the frailty status as defined by the deficit accumulation method and may serve as a physical biomarker of human aging.
Kim D, Kim H, Hwang R, Jung S, Kim M, Ko Y Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025; 17:3341-3353.
PMID: 39759961 PMC: 11699829. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S478550.
Shin H, Kim Y, Park Y, Koo S, Son W, Han J Nutrients. 2023; 15(6).
PMID: 36986111 PMC: 10051771. DOI: 10.3390/nu15061381.
The Frail Depressed Patient: A Narrative Review on Treatment Challenges.
Aprahamian I, Borges M, Hanssen D, Jeuring H, Oude Voshaar R Clin Interv Aging. 2022; 17:979-990.
PMID: 35770239 PMC: 9234191. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S328432.
Operationalization of the Clinical Frailty Scale in Korean Community-Dwelling Older People.
Jung H, Baek J, Jang I, Lee E Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:880511.
PMID: 35755053 PMC: 9226398. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.880511.
Hernandez H, Ong E, Heyzer L, Tan C, Ghazali F, Yang D Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2022; 26(2):125-133.
PMID: 35399043 PMC: 9271393. DOI: 10.4235/agmr.22.0022.