» Articles » PMID: 32762010

Plasma Proteomic Profile of Frailty

Overview
Journal Aging Cell
Specialties Cell Biology
Geriatrics
Date 2020 Aug 8
PMID 32762010
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Frailty is a state of decreased physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to adverse outcomes in aging, and is characterized by dysregulation across various biological pathways. Frailty may manifest biologically as alteration in protein expression, possibly regulated at genetic, transcriptional and epigenetic levels. In this study, we examined the proteomic profile associated with frailty defined by an established cumulative frailty index (FI). Using the SomaScan assay, 4265 proteins were measured in plasma, of which 55 were positively associated and 88 were negatively associated with the FI. The proteins most strongly associated with frailty were fatty acid-binding proteins, including fatty acid-binding protein (FABP) (p = 1.96 × 10 ) and FABPA (p = 8.10 × 10 ), leptin (p = 1.43 × 10 ), and ANTR2 (p = 7.95 × 10 ). Pathway analysis with the top 143 frailty-associated proteins revealed enrichment for proteins in pathways related to lipid metabolism, musculoskeletal development and function, cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, cellular assembly, and organization. Frailty prediction model constructed with elastic net regression utilizing 110 proteins demonstrated a correlation between predicted frailty and observed frailty (r = 0.57, p < 2.2 × 10 ). Predicted frailty was also more strongly correlated with chronological age (r = 0.54, p < 2.2 × 10 ) than observed frailty (r = 0.37, p = 1.2 × 10 ). This study identified novel proteins and pathways related to frailty that may offer improved frailty phenotyping and prediction.

Citing Articles

Differential proteomic profiles between cognitive frail and robust older adults from the MELoR cohort.

Lim S, Ng Y, Majeed A, Tan M, Khor H, Kamaruzzaman S Geroscience. 2024; .

PMID: 39653973 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-024-01462-z.


Proteo-metabolomic insights for early dual physical and cognitive impairments: A search for biomarkers of healthy aging based on muscle-brain crosstalk.

Huang Y, Chang W, Huang C, Lin C, Peng L, Chung C Aging Cell. 2024; 24(3):e14407.

PMID: 39517120 PMC: 11896308. DOI: 10.1111/acel.14407.


A unified metric of human immune health.

Sparks R, Rachmaninoff N, Lau W, Hirsch D, Bansal N, Martins A Nat Med. 2024; 30(9):2461-2472.

PMID: 38961223 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03092-6.


Cerebrospinal fluid proteomic profile of frailty: Results from the PROLIPHYC cohort.

Guillotin S, Fulzele A, Vallet A, Gonzalez de Peredo A, Mouton-Barbosa E, Cestac P Aging Cell. 2024; 23(7):e14168.

PMID: 38698559 PMC: 11258431. DOI: 10.1111/acel.14168.


Loneliness Predicts Progression of Frailty in Married and Widowed, but Not Unmarried Community Dwelling Older Adults.

Pollak C, Verghese J, Buchman A, Jin Y, Blumen H J Frailty Aging. 2024; 13(2):163-171.

PMID: 38616373 PMC: 11898203. DOI: 10.14283/jfa.2024.27.


References
1.
Mari D, Coppola R, Provenzano R . Hemostasis factors and aging. Exp Gerontol. 2007; 43(2):66-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2007.06.014. View

2.
De Martinis M, Franceschi C, Monti D, Ginaldi L . Inflammation markers predicting frailty and mortality in the elderly. Exp Mol Pathol. 2006; 80(3):219-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2005.11.004. View

3.
Liu C, Lyass A, Larson M, Massaro J, Wang N, DAgostino Sr R . Biomarkers of oxidative stress are associated with frailty: the Framingham Offspring Study. Age (Dordr). 2015; 38(1):1. PMC: 5005887. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-015-9864-z. View

4.
Lee K, Santibanez-Koref M, Polvikoski T, Birchall D, Mendelow A, Keavney B . Increased expression of fatty acid binding protein 4 and leptin in resident macrophages characterises atherosclerotic plaque rupture. Atherosclerosis. 2012; 226(1):74-81. PMC: 3566542. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.09.037. View

5.
Soysal P, Stubbs B, Lucato P, Luchini C, Solmi M, Peluso R . Inflammation and frailty in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2016; 31:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2016.08.006. View