» Articles » PMID: 33169518

Parents' Experiences of Complementary Feeding Among a United Kingdom Culturally Diverse and Deprived Community

Overview
Date 2020 Nov 10
PMID 33169518
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Complementary feeding practices and adherence to health recommendations are influenced by a range of different and often interrelating factors such as socio-economic and cultural factors. However, the factors underlying these associations are often complex with less awareness of how complementary feeding approaches vary across the UK's diverse population. This paper describes a qualitative investigation undertaken in a deprived and culturally diverse community in the UK which aimed to explore parents' knowledge, beliefs and practices of complementary feeding. One hundred and ten mothers and fathers, self-identified as being White British, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Black African/Caribbean or Polish took part in twenty-four focus group discussions, organised by age group, sex and ethnicity. The findings revealed that most parents initiated complementary feeding before the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendation of 6 months. Early initiation was strongly influenced by breast feeding practices alongside the extent to which parents believed that their usual milk; that is, breastmilk or formula was fulfilling their infants' nutritional needs. The composition of diet and parents' approach to complementary feeding was closely aligned to traditional cultural practices; however, some contradictions were noted. The findings also acknowledge the pertinent role of the father in influencing the dietary practices of the wider household. Learning about both the common and unique cultural feeding attitudes and practices held by parents may help us to tailor healthy complementary feeding advice in the context of increasing diversity in the United Kingdom.

Citing Articles

Factors influencing perceptions of processed baby foods and feeding practices among Indian mothers: a qualitative investigation.

Singh S BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2734.

PMID: 39379900 PMC: 11460025. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19631-2.


A Comparison of Infant Feeding Practices in South Asian-Born Mothers and Australian-Born Mothers Living in Australia.

Khokhar D, Bolton K Nutrients. 2024; 16(16).

PMID: 39203717 PMC: 11357187. DOI: 10.3390/nu16162577.


Application of the Social Cognitive Theory amid food parenting practices of Black immigrant mothers in the US: A qualitative study.

Tchoua P, Brannock M, Quesenberry D PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0298847.

PMID: 39116188 PMC: 11309485. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298847.


Knowledge, attitude and practice among mothers on the relationship between honey and botulism in Saudi Arabian infants: a cross-section study.

Bamumin A, Bamumin S, Ahmadini H, Alhindi Y, Alsanosi S, Alqashqari H Ann Med. 2023; 55(2):2279746.

PMID: 37943711 PMC: 10653683. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2279746.


Are Complementary Feeding Practices Aligned with Current Recommendations? A Narrative Review.

Nantel A, Gingras V Children (Basel). 2023; 10(5).

PMID: 37238342 PMC: 10217166. DOI: 10.3390/children10050794.


References
1.
Zielinska M, Rust P, Masztalerz-Kozubek D, Bichler J, Hamulka J . Factors Influencing the Age of Complementary Feeding-A Cross-Sectional Study from Two European Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(20). PMC: 6843416. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16203799. View

2.
Brown A, Jones S, Rowan H . Baby-Led Weaning: The Evidence to Date. Curr Nutr Rep. 2017; 6(2):148-156. PMC: 5438437. DOI: 10.1007/s13668-017-0201-2. View

3.
Powell R, Single H . Focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996; 8(5):499-504. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499. View

4.
Alder E, Williams F, Anderson A, Forsyth S, Florey C, van der Velde P . What influences the timing of the introduction of solid food to infants?. Br J Nutr. 2004; 92(3):527-31. DOI: 10.1079/bjn20041212. View

5.
Cameron S, Heath A, Taylor R . How feasible is Baby-led Weaning as an approach to infant feeding? A review of the evidence. Nutrients. 2012; 4(11):1575-609. PMC: 3509508. DOI: 10.3390/nu4111575. View