» Articles » PMID: 33154162

The Cytoplasmic Domain of the AAA+ Protease FtsH is Tilted with Respect to the Membrane to Facilitate Substrate Entry

Overview
Journal J Biol Chem
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2020 Nov 6
PMID 33154162
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

AAA+ proteases are degradation machines that use ATP hydrolysis to unfold protein substrates and translocate them through a central pore toward a degradation chamber. FtsH, a bacterial membrane-anchored AAA+ protease, plays a vital role in membrane protein quality control. How substrates reach the FtsH central pore is an open key question that is not resolved by the available atomic structures of cytoplasmic and periplasmic domains. In this work, we used both negative stain TEM and cryo-EM to determine 3D maps of the full-length Aquifex aeolicus FtsH protease. Unexpectedly, we observed that detergent solubilization induces the formation of fully active FtsH dodecamers, which consist of two FtsH hexamers in a single detergent micelle. The striking tilted conformation of the cytosolic domain in the FtsH dodecamer visualized by negative stain TEM suggests a lateral substrate entrance between the membrane and cytosolic domain. Such a substrate path was then resolved in the cryo-EM structure of the FtsH hexamer. By mapping the available structural information and structure predictions for the transmembrane helices to the amino acid sequence we identified a linker of ∼20 residues between the second transmembrane helix and the cytosolic domain. This unique polypeptide appears to be highly flexible and turned out to be essential for proper functioning of FtsH as its deletion fully eliminated the proteolytic activity of FtsH.

Citing Articles

Signaling through the PbgA-LapB regulatory complex activates LpxC proteolysis and limits lipopolysaccharide biogenesis during stationary-phase growth.

Mettlach J, Cian M, Chakraborty M, Dalebroux Z J Bacteriol. 2024; 206(4):e0030823.

PMID: 38534107 PMC: 11025326. DOI: 10.1128/jb.00308-23.


Investigation of CRISPR-Independent Phage Resistance Mechanisms Reveals a Role for FtsH in Phage Adsorption to Streptococcus thermophilus.

Garrett S, Philippe C, Kim J, Wei Y, Johnson K, Olson S J Bacteriol. 2023; 205(6):e0048222.

PMID: 37255445 PMC: 10294649. DOI: 10.1128/jb.00482-22.


FtsH degrades dihydrofolate reductase by recognizing a partially folded species.

Morehouse J, Baker T, Sauer R Protein Sci. 2023; 31(9):e4410.

PMID: 36630366 PMC: 9601784. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4410.


Occurrence and potential mechanism of holin-mediated non-lytic protein translocation in bacteria.

Bruser T, Mehner-Breitfeld D Microb Cell. 2022; 9(10):159-173.

PMID: 36262927 PMC: 9527704. DOI: 10.15698/mic2022.10.785.


Recent Advances in Understanding the Structural and Functional Evolution of FtsH Proteases.

Yi L, Liu B, Nixon P, Yu J, Chen F Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:837528.

PMID: 35463435 PMC: 9020784. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.837528.


References
1.
Suno R, Shimoyama M, Abe A, Shimamura T, Shimodate N, Watanabe Y . Conformational transition of the lid helix covering the protease active site is essential for the ATP-dependent protease activity of FtsH. FEBS Lett. 2012; 586(19):3117-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.07.069. View

2.
Kereiche S, Kovacik L, Bednar J, Pevala V, Kunova N, Ondrovicova G . The N-terminal domain plays a crucial role in the structure of a full-length human mitochondrial Lon protease. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:33631. PMC: 5025710. DOI: 10.1038/srep33631. View

3.
Tang G, Peng L, Baldwin P, Mann D, Jiang W, Rees I . EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J Struct Biol. 2006; 157(1):38-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.05.009. View

4.
Niwa H, Tsuchiya D, Makyio H, Yoshida M, Morikawa K . Hexameric ring structure of the ATPase domain of the membrane-integrated metalloprotease FtsH from Thermus thermophilus HB8. Structure. 2002; 10(10):1415-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(02)00855-9. View

5.
Tusnady G, Simon I . The HMMTOP transmembrane topology prediction server. Bioinformatics. 2001; 17(9):849-50. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.849. View