» Articles » PMID: 33147836

Review of Laser Raman Spectroscopy for Surgical Breast Cancer Detection: Stochastic Backpropagation Neural Networks

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2020 Nov 5
PMID 33147836
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Laser Raman spectroscopy (LRS) is a highly specific biomolecular technique which has been shown to have the ability to distinguish malignant and normal breast tissue. This paper discusses significant advancements in the use of LRS in surgical breast cancer diagnosis, with an emphasis on statistical and machine learning strategies employed for precise, transparent and real-time analysis of Raman spectra. When combined with a variety of "machine learning" techniques LRS has been increasingly employed in oncogenic diagnostics. This paper proposes that the majority of these algorithms fail to provide the two most critical pieces of information required by the practicing surgeon: a probability that the classification of a tissue is correct, and, more importantly, the expected error in that probability. Stochastic backpropagation artificial neural networks inherently provide both pieces of information for each and every tissue site examined by LRS. If the networks are trained using both human experts and an unsupervised classification algorithm as gold standards, rapid progress can be made understanding what additional contextual data is needed to improve network classification performance. Our patients expect us to not simply have an opinion about their tumor, but to know how certain we are that we are correct. Stochastic networks can provide that information.

Citing Articles

PLK1 Inhibitor Onvansertib Enhances the Efficacy of Alpelisib in -Mutated HR-Positive Breast Cancer Resistant to Palbociclib and Endocrine Therapy: Preclinical Insights.

Sreekumar S, Montaudon E, Klein D, Gonzalez M, Painsec P, Derrien H Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(19).

PMID: 39409880 PMC: 11476299. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193259.


Improving skin cancer detection by Raman spectroscopy using convolutional neural networks and data augmentation.

Zhao J, Lui H, Kalia S, Lee T, Zeng H Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1320220.

PMID: 38962264 PMC: 11219827. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1320220.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Tissue In Vitro after PDT Therapy.

Bartusik-Aebisher D, Mytych W, Dynarowicz K, Mysliwiec A, Machorowska-Pieniazek A, Cieslar G Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38473036 PMC: 10930664. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14050563.


Review of the application of the most current sophisticated image processing methods for the skin cancer diagnostics purposes.

Myslicka M, Kawala-Sterniuk A, Bryniarska A, Sudol A, Podpora M, Gasz R Arch Dermatol Res. 2024; 316(4):99.

PMID: 38446274 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-024-02828-1.


Multimodal Optical Coherence Tomography for Intraoperative Evaluation of Tumor Margins and Surgical Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Vorontsov D, Gubarkova E, Sirotkina M, Sovetsky A, Plekhanov A, Kuznetsov S Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2023; 14(2):26-38.

PMID: 37065422 PMC: 10090927. DOI: 10.17691/stm2022.14.2.03.


References
1.
Shang L, Ma D, Fu J, Lu Y, Zhao Y, Xu X . Fluorescence imaging and Raman spectroscopy applied for the accurate diagnosis of breast cancer with deep learning algorithms. Biomed Opt Express. 2020; 11(7):3673-3683. PMC: 7510916. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.394772. View

2.
Maloney B, McClatchy D, Pogue B, Paulsen K, Wells W, Barth R . Review of methods for intraoperative margin detection for breast conserving surgery. J Biomed Opt. 2018; 23(10):1-19. PMC: 6210801. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.10.100901. View

3.
Bayes T . An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. 1763. MD Comput. 1991; 8(3):157-71. View

4.
Fereidouni F, Harmany Z, Tian M, Todd A, Kintner J, McPherson J . Microscopy with ultraviolet surface excitation for rapid slide-free histology. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019; 1(12):957-966. PMC: 6223324. DOI: 10.1038/s41551-017-0165-y. View

5.
Revelle W . Hierarchical Cluster Analysis And The Internal Structure Of Tests. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016; 14(1):57-74. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1401_4. View