» Articles » PMID: 23915805

Spectral Discrimination of Breast Pathologies in Situ Using Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2013 Aug 7
PMID 23915805
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Nationally, 25% to 50% of patients undergoing lumpectomy for local management of breast cancer require a secondary excision because of the persistence of residual tumor. Intraoperative assessment of specimen margins by frozen-section analysis is not widely adopted in breast-conserving surgery. Here, a new approach to wide-field optical imaging of breast pathology in situ was tested to determine whether the system could accurately discriminate cancer from benign tissues before routine pathological processing.

Methods: Spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) was used to quantify near-infrared (NIR) optical parameters at the surface of 47 lumpectomy tissue specimens. Spatial frequency and wavelength-dependent reflectance spectra were parameterized with matched simulations of light transport. Spectral images were co-registered to histopathology in adjacent, stained sections of the tissue, cut in the geometry imaged in situ. A supervised classifier and feature-selection algorithm were implemented to automate discrimination of breast pathologies and to rank the contribution of each parameter to a diagnosis.

Results: Spectral parameters distinguished all pathology subtypes with 82% accuracy and benign (fibrocystic disease, fibroadenoma) from malignant (DCIS, invasive cancer, and partially treated invasive cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy) pathologies with 88% accuracy, high specificity (93%), and reasonable sensitivity (79%). Although spectral absorption and scattering features were essential components of the discriminant classifier, scattering exhibited lower variance and contributed most to tissue-type separation. The scattering slope was sensitive to stromal and epithelial distributions measured with quantitative immunohistochemistry.

Conclusions: SFDI is a new quantitative imaging technique that renders a specific tissue-type diagnosis. Its combination of planar sampling and frequency-dependent depth sensing is clinically pragmatic and appropriate for breast surgical-margin assessment. This study is the first to apply SFDI to pathology discrimination in surgical breast tissues. It represents an important step toward imaging surgical specimens immediately ex vivo to reduce the high rate of secondary excisions associated with breast lumpectomy procedures.

Citing Articles

Using spatial frequency domain imaging to monitor a skin biopsy wound: a pilot study.

Zhang L, Bounds A, Girkin J Biomed Opt Express. 2024; 15(10):5872-5885.

PMID: 39421765 PMC: 11482166. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.536843.


PoLambRimetry: a multispectral polarimetric atlas of lamb brain.

Mieites V, Anichini G, Qi J, ONeill K, Conde O, Elson D J Biomed Opt. 2024; 29(9):096002.

PMID: 39290462 PMC: 11406468. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.9.096002.


Macroscopic inelastic scattering imaging using a hyperspectral line-scanning system identifies invasive breast cancer in lumpectomy and mastectomy specimens.

David S, Tavera H, Trang T, Dallaire F, Daoust F, Tremblay F J Biomed Opt. 2024; 29(6):065004.

PMID: 38846676 PMC: 11155388. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.6.065004.


Hyperspectral dark-field microscopy of human breast lumpectomy samples for tumor margin detection in breast-conserving surgery.

Hwang J, Cheney P, Kanick S, Le H, McClatchy 3rd D, Zhang H J Biomed Opt. 2024; 29(9):093503.

PMID: 38715717 PMC: 11075096. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.9.093503.


Evaluating Receptor-Specific Fresh Specimen Staining for Tumor Margin Detection in Clinical Breast Specimens.

Byrd B, Wells W, Strawbridge R, Barth C, Samkoe K, Gibbs S Mol Imaging Biol. 2023; 25(5):911-922.

PMID: 37351769 PMC: 10598096. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-022-01771-9.


References
1.
Kukreti S, Cerussi A, Tromberg B, Gratton E . Intrinsic near-infrared spectroscopic markers of breast tumors. Dis Markers. 2009; 25(6):281-90. PMC: 2732199. DOI: 10.1155/2008/651308. View

2.
Spivack B, Khanna M, Tafra L, Juillard G, Giuliano A . Margin status and local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Arch Surg. 1994; 129(9):952-6; discussion 956-7. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420330066013. View

3.
Bigio I, Bown S, Briggs G, Kelley C, Lakhani S, Pickard D . Diagnosis of breast cancer using elastic-scattering spectroscopy: preliminary clinical results. J Biomed Opt. 2000; 5(2):221-8. DOI: 10.1117/1.429990. View

4.
Saarela A, Paloneva T, Rissanen T, Kiviniemi H . Determinants of positive histologic margins and residual tumor after lumpectomy for early breast cancer: a prospective study with special reference to touch preparation cytology. J Surg Oncol. 1998; 66(4):248-53. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199712)66:4<248::aid-jso5>3.0.co;2-b. View

5.
Nguyen F, Zysk A, Chaney E, Kotynek J, Oliphant U, Bellafiore F . Intraoperative evaluation of breast tumor margins with optical coherence tomography. Cancer Res. 2009; 69(22):8790-6. PMC: 2782920. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4340. View