» Articles » PMID: 33075052

After the Honeymoon, the Divorce: Unexpected Outcomes of Disease Control Measures Against Endemic Infections

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Oct 19
PMID 33075052
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The lack of effective vaccines for many endemic diseases often forces policymakers to rely on non-immunizing control measures, such as vector control, to reduce the massive burden of these diseases. Controls can have well-known counterintuitive effects on endemic infections, including the honeymoon effect, in which partially effective controls cause not only a greater initial reduction in infection than expected, but also large outbreaks during control resulting from accumulation of susceptibles. Unfortunately, many control measures cannot be maintained indefinitely, and the results of cessation are poorly understood. Here, we examine the results of stopped or failed non-immunizing control measures in endemic settings. By using a mathematical model to compare the cumulative number of cases expected with and without control, we show that deployment of control can lead to a larger total number of infections, counting from the time that control started, than without any control-the divorce effect. This result is directly related to the population-level loss of immunity resulting from non-immunizing controls and is seen in a variety of models when non-immunizing controls are used against an infection that confers immunity. Finally, we examine three control plans for minimizing the magnitude of the divorce effect in seasonal infections and show that they are incapable of eliminating the divorce effect. While we do not suggest stopping control programs that rely on non-immunizing controls, our results strongly argue that the accumulation of susceptibility should be considered before deploying such controls against endemic infections when indefinite use of the control is unlikely. We highlight that our results are particularly germane to endemic mosquito-borne infections, such as dengue virus, both for routine management involving vector control and for field trials of novel control approaches, and in the context of non-pharmaceutical interventions aimed at COVID-19.

Citing Articles

How population control of pests is modulated by density dependence: The perspective of genetic biocontrol.

Butler C, Lloyd A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39605380 PMC: 11601221. DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.08.622719.


Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Group A Streptococcal Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Epprecht G, Weller D, Hofmaenner D, Andrianaki A, Frey P, Brugger S Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024; 11(10):ofae572.

PMID: 39450400 PMC: 11500445. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae572.


Rapid expansion and international spread of M1 in the post-pandemic UK upsurge of Streptococcus pyogenes.

Vieira A, Wan Y, Ryan Y, Li H, Guy R, Papangeli M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):3916.

PMID: 38729927 PMC: 11087535. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47929-7.


Assessing the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence, clinical presentation, and clindamycin resistance rates of infections.

Marco D, Canela J, Brey M, Soriano A, Pitart C, Herrera S IJID Reg. 2024; 11:100349.

PMID: 38558547 PMC: 10973571. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.03.004.


Sensitivity of endemic behaviour of COVID-19 under a multi-dose vaccination regime, to various biological parameters and control variables.

Dagpunar J, Wu C R Soc Open Sci. 2023; 10(5):221277.

PMID: 37181796 PMC: 10170348. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.221277.


References
1.
Klepac P, Funk S, Hollingsworth T, Metcalf C, Hampson K . Six challenges in the eradication of infectious diseases. Epidemics. 2015; 10:97-101. PMC: 7612385. DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2014.12.001. View

2.
Bacaer N, Gomes M . On the final size of epidemics with seasonality. Bull Math Biol. 2009; 71(8):1954-66. DOI: 10.1007/s11538-009-9433-7. View

3.
Bhatt S, Gething P, Brady O, Messina J, Farlow A, Moyes C . The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013; 496(7446):504-7. PMC: 3651993. DOI: 10.1038/nature12060. View

4.
Heesterbeek H, Anderson R, Andreasen V, Bansal S, De Angelis D, Dye C . Modeling infectious disease dynamics in the complex landscape of global health. Science. 2015; 347(6227):aaa4339. PMC: 4445966. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa4339. View

5.
Bowman L, Donegan S, McCall P . Is Dengue Vector Control Deficient in Effectiveness or Evidence?: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016; 10(3):e0004551. PMC: 4795802. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004551. View