» Articles » PMID: 33062240

Aesthetic Perception of Line Patterns: Effect of Edge-Orientation Entropy and Curvilinear Shape

Overview
Journal Iperception
Date 2020 Oct 16
PMID 33062240
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Curvilinearity is a perceptual feature that robustly predicts preference ratings for a variety of visual stimuli. The predictive effect of curved/angular shape overlaps, to a large degree, with regularities in second-order edge-orientation entropy, which captures how independent edge orientations are distributed across an image. For some complex line patterns, edge-orientation entropy is actually a better predictor for what human observers like than curved/angular shape. The present work was designed to disentangle the role of the two features in artificial patterns that consisted of either curved or angular line elements. We systematically varied these patterns across two more dimensions, edge-orientation entropy and the number of lines. Eighty-three participants rated the stimuli along three aesthetic dimensions (, , and ). Results showed that curved/angular shape was a stronger predictor for ratings of and if the stimuli consisted of a few lines that were clearly discernible. By contrast, edge-orientation entropy was a stronger predictor for the ratings if the stimuli showed many lines, which merged into a texture. No such differences were obtained for complexity ratings. Our findings are in line with results from neurophysiological studies that the processing of shape and texture, respectively, is mediated by different cortical mechanisms.

Citing Articles

A toolbox for calculating quantitative image properties in aesthetics research.

Redies C, Bartho R, Kossmann L, Spehar B, Hubner R, Wagemans J Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(4):117.

PMID: 40087197 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-025-02632-3.


The edge orientation entropy of natural scenes is associated with infant visual preferences and adult aesthetic judgements.

McAdams P, Svobodova S, Newman T, Terry K, Mather G, Skelton A PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0316555.

PMID: 40009579 PMC: 11864518. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316555.


Support for the efficient coding account of visual discomfort.

OHare L, Hibbard P Vis Neurosci. 2024; 41():E008.

PMID: 39721939 PMC: 11730975. DOI: 10.1017/S0952523824000051.


Statistical image properties predict aesthetic ratings in abstract paintings created by neural style transfer.

Geller H, Bartho R, Thommes K, Redies C Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:999720.

PMID: 36312022 PMC: 9606769. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.999720.


The Presence of a Visual Dividing Line Increases Consumer Memory Through Attention Grabbing.

Ouyang J, Jia Y Front Psychol. 2022; 13:848471.

PMID: 35496225 PMC: 9039128. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848471.


References
1.
Mather G . Aesthetic Image Statistics Vary with Artistic Genre. Vision (Basel). 2020; 4(1). PMC: 7157489. DOI: 10.3390/vision4010010. View

2.
Stanischewski S, Altmann C, Brachmann A, Redies C . Aesthetic Perception of Line Patterns: Effect of Edge-Orientation Entropy and Curvilinear Shape. Iperception. 2020; 11(5):2041669520950749. PMC: 7533941. DOI: 10.1177/2041669520950749. View

3.
Redies C . A universal model of esthetic perception based on the sensory coding of natural stimuli. Spat Vis. 2007; 21(1-2):97-117. DOI: 10.1163/156856807782753886. View

4.
Bertamini M, Palumbo L, Redies C . An advantage for smooth compared with angular contours in the speed of processing shape. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019; 45(10):1304-1318. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000669. View

5.
Spillmann L, Dresp-Langley B, Tseng C . Beyond the classical receptive field: The effect of contextual stimuli. J Vis. 2015; 15(9):7. DOI: 10.1167/15.9.7. View