A Comparative Analysis of Chromatin Accessibility in Cattle, Pig, and Mouse Tissues

Overview

Journal BMC Genomics

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Genetics

Date 2020 Oct 8

PMID 33028202

Citations 30

Authors

Michelle M Halstead

Colin Kern

Perot Saelao

Ying Wang

Ganrea Chanthavixay

Juan F Medrano

Alison L Van Eenennaam

Ian Korf

Christopher K Tuggle

Catherine W Ernst

Huaijun Zhou

Pablo J Ross

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Although considerable progress has been made towards annotating the noncoding portion of the human and mouse genomes, regulatory elements in other species, such as livestock, remain poorly characterized. This lack of functional annotation poses a substantial roadblock to agricultural research and diminishes the value of these species as model organisms. As active regulatory elements are typically characterized by chromatin accessibility, we implemented the Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin (ATAC-seq) to annotate and characterize regulatory elements in pigs and cattle, given a set of eight adult tissues.

Results: Overall, 306,304 and 273,594 active regulatory elements were identified in pig and cattle, respectively. 71,478 porcine and 47,454 bovine regulatory elements were highly tissue-specific and were correspondingly enriched for binding motifs of known tissue-specific transcription factors. However, in every tissue the most prevalent accessible motif corresponded to the insulator CTCF, suggesting pervasive involvement in 3-D chromatin organization. Taking advantage of a similar dataset in mouse, open chromatin in pig, cattle, and mice were compared, revealing that the conservation of regulatory elements, in terms of sequence identity and accessibility, was consistent with evolutionary distance; whereas pig and cattle shared about 20% of accessible sites, mice and ungulates only had about 10% of accessible sites in common. Furthermore, conservation of accessibility was more prevalent at promoters than at intergenic regions.

Conclusions: The lack of conserved accessibility at distal elements is consistent with rapid evolution of enhancers, and further emphasizes the need to annotate regulatory elements in individual species, rather than inferring elements based on homology. This atlas of chromatin accessibility in cattle and pig constitutes a substantial step towards annotating livestock genomes and dissecting the regulatory link between genome and phenome.

Citing Articles

Comparative epigenetics of domestic animals: focusing on DNA accessibility and its impact on gene regulation and traits.

Lee J, Cho J J Vet Sci. 2025; 26(1):e9.

PMID: 39901471 PMC: 11799094. DOI: 10.4142/jvs.24259.

An overview of recent technological developments in bovine genomics.

Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N Vet Anim Sci. 2024; 25:100382.

PMID: 39166173 PMC: 11334705. DOI: 10.1016/j.vas.2024.100382.

Multi-omic characterization of allele-specific regulatory variation in hybrid pigs.

Quan J, Yang M, Wang X, Cai G, Ding R, Zhuang Z Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5587.

PMID: 38961076 PMC: 11222378. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49923-5.

Chromatin profiling and state predictions reveal insights into epigenetic regulation during early porcine development.

Innis S, Cabot R Epigenetics Chromatin. 2024; 17(1):16.

PMID: 38773546 PMC: 11106951. DOI: 10.1186/s13072-024-00542-w.

Cross-Species Comparative DNA Methylation Reveals Novel Insights into Complex Trait Genetics among Cattle, Sheep, and Goats.

Chen S, Liu S, Shi S, Yin H, Tang Y, Zhang J Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(2).

PMID: 38266195 PMC: 10834038. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae003.

References

Herrero J, Muffato M, Beal K, Fitzgerald S, Gordon L, Pignatelli M . Ensembl comparative genomics resources. Database (Oxford). 2016; 2016. PMC: 4852398. DOI: 10.1093/database/baw053. View

Bayam E, Sahin G, Guzelsoy G, Guner G, Kabakcioglu A, Ince-Dunn G . Genome-wide target analysis of NEUROD2 provides new insights into regulation of cortical projection neuron migration and differentiation. BMC Genomics. 2015; 16:681. PMC: 4560887. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1882-9. View

Gottesfeld J, Carey M . Introduction to the Thematic Minireview Series: Chromatin and transcription. J Biol Chem. 2018; 293(36):13775-13777. PMC: 6130936. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.TM118.004544. View

Hou C, Dale R, Dean A . Cell type specificity of chromatin organization mediated by CTCF and cohesin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(8):3651-6. PMC: 2840441. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912087107. View

Verfaillie A, Imrichova H, Atak Z, Dewaele M, Rambow F, Hulselmans G . Decoding the regulatory landscape of melanoma reveals TEADS as regulators of the invasive cell state. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:6683. PMC: 4403341. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7683. View

Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N . The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25(16):2078-9. PMC: 2723002. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. View

Kern C, Wang Y, Chitwood J, Korf I, Delany M, Cheng H . Genome-wide identification of tissue-specific long non-coding RNA in three farm animal species. BMC Genomics. 2018; 19(1):684. PMC: 6145346. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-5037-7. View

Tugrul M, Paixao T, Barton N, Tkacik G . Dynamics of Transcription Factor Binding Site Evolution. PLoS Genet. 2015; 11(11):e1005639. PMC: 4636380. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005639. View

de Dieuleveult M, Yen K, Hmitou I, Depaux A, Boussouar F, Bou Dargham D . Genome-wide nucleosome specificity and function of chromatin remodellers in ES cells. Nature. 2016; 530(7588):113-6. PMC: 4871117. DOI: 10.1038/nature16505. View

10.

Shibata Y, Sheffield N, Fedrigo O, Babbitt C, Wortham M, Tewari A . Extensive evolutionary changes in regulatory element activity during human origins are associated with altered gene expression and positive selection. PLoS Genet. 2012; 8(6):e1002789. PMC: 3386175. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002789. View

11.

Yang Y, Zhang Y, Ren B, Dixon J, Ma J . Comparing 3D Genome Organization in Multiple Species Using Phylo-HMRF. Cell Syst. 2019; 8(6):494-505.e14. PMC: 6706282. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2019.05.011. View

12.

Arnold C, Gerlach D, Spies D, Matts J, Sytnikova Y, Pagani M . Quantitative genome-wide enhancer activity maps for five Drosophila species show functional enhancer conservation and turnover during cis-regulatory evolution. Nat Genet. 2014; 46(7):685-92. PMC: 4250274. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3009. View

13.

Stunnenberg H, Hirst M . The International Human Epigenome Consortium: A Blueprint for Scientific Collaboration and Discovery. Cell. 2016; 167(5):1145-1149. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.007. View

14.

Halstead M, Kern C, Saelao P, Chanthavixay G, Wang Y, Delany M . Systematic alteration of ATAC-seq for profiling open chromatin in cryopreserved nuclei preparations from livestock tissues. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):5230. PMC: 7089989. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61678-9. View

15.

Ren G, Jin W, Cui K, Rodrigez J, Hu G, Zhang Z . CTCF-Mediated Enhancer-Promoter Interaction Is a Critical Regulator of Cell-to-Cell Variation of Gene Expression. Mol Cell. 2017; 67(6):1049-1058.e6. PMC: 5828172. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.08.026. View

16.

Ludwig M, Bergman C, Patel N, Kreitman M . Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer element. Nature. 2000; 403(6769):564-7. DOI: 10.1038/35000615. View

17.

Adhikari K, Fontanil T, Cal S, Mendoza-Revilla J, Fuentes-Guajardo M, Chacon-Duque J . A genome-wide association scan in admixed Latin Americans identifies loci influencing facial and scalp hair features. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:10815. PMC: 4773514. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10815. View

18.

Rao S, Huntley M, Durand N, Stamenova E, Bochkov I, Robinson J . A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2014; 159(7):1665-80. PMC: 5635824. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021. View

19.

Huang D, Sherman B, Lempicki R . Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009; 4(1):44-57. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. View

20.

Andersson L, Archibald A, Bottema C, Brauning R, Burgess S, Burt D . Coordinated international action to accelerate genome-to-phenome with FAANG, the Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes project. Genome Biol. 2015; 16:57. PMC: 4373242. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0622-4. View