» Articles » PMID: 33007801

Characteristics of the IVF Cycle That Contribute to the Incidence of Mosaicism

Overview
Journal Genes (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Oct 3
PMID 33007801
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Highly sensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms applied to preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) allow the classification of mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies. However, the incidence of mosaicism reported by these tests can be affected by a wide number of analytical, biological, and clinical factors. With the use of a proprietary algorithm for automated diagnosis of aneuploidy and mosaicism, we retrospectively analyzed a large series of 115,368 trophectoderm biopsies from 27,436 PGT-A cycles to determine whether certain biological factors and fertilization (IVF) practices influence the incidence of overall aneuploidy, whole uniform aneuploidy, mosaicism, and TE biopsies with only segmental aneuploidy. Older female and male patients showed higher rates of high-mosaic degree and whole uniform aneuploidies and severe oligozoospermic patients had higher rates of mosaicism and only segmental aneuploidies. Logistic regression analysis identified a positive effect of female age but a negative effect of embryo vitrification on the incidence of overall aneuploid embryos. Female age increased whole uniform aneuploidy rates but decreased only segmental aneuploidy and mosaicism, mainly low-mosaics. Conversely, higher ovarian response decreased whole uniform aneuploidy rates but increased only segmental aneuploidies. Finally, embryo vitrification decreased whole uniform aneuploidy rates but increased mosaicism, mainly low-mosaics, compared to PGT-A cycles with fresh oocytes. These results could be useful for clinician's management of the IVF cycles.

Citing Articles

The diagnostic accuracy of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in assessing the genetic status of embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen K, Hu Z, Lian Y, Han Y, Zhou X, Li Y Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(1):39.

PMID: 40069837 PMC: 11895315. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-025-01376-1.


Embryo Mosaicism Rate in National Referral Hospital of Indonesia Detected Using Next-Generation Sequencing: A Retrospective Study.

Harzif A, Ikhsan M, Ameilia Iffanolida P, Mutia K, Wiweko B, Muharam R Int J Fertil Steril. 2025; 19(1):58-63.

PMID: 39827392 PMC: 11744205. DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2024.2018140.1592.


Non-invasively predicting euploidy in human blastocysts via quantitative 3D morphology measurement: a retrospective cohort study.

Shan G, Abdalla K, Liu H, Dai C, Tan J, Law J Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024; 22(1):132.

PMID: 39468586 PMC: 11514912. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01302-x.


Healthy Live Births after the Transfer of Mosaic Embryos: Self-Correction or PGT-A Overestimation?.

Campos G, Sciorio R, Fleming S Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(1).

PMID: 38275600 PMC: 10815078. DOI: 10.3390/genes15010018.


Exploring the efficacy and beneficial population of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy start from the oocyte retrieval cycle: a real-world study.

Ma S, Liao J, Zhang S, Yang X, Hocher B, Tan J J Transl Med. 2023; 21(1):779.

PMID: 37919732 PMC: 10623718. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04641-2.


References
1.
Silber S, Escudero T, Lenahan K, Abdelhadi I, Kilani Z, Munne S . Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos derived from testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril. 2003; 79(1):30-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04407-2. View

2.
Forman E, Li X, Ferry K, Scott K, Treff N, Scott Jr R . Oocyte vitrification does not increase the risk of embryonic aneuploidy or diminish the implantation potential of blastocysts created after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel, paired randomized controlled trial using DNA fingerprinting. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98(3):644-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.028. View

3.
Sanchez-Castro M, Jimenez-Macedo A, Sandalinas M, Blanco J . Prognostic value of sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis over PGD. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24(6):1516-21. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep037. View

4.
Ferraretti A, La Marca A, Fauser B, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L . ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(7):1616-24. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der092. View

5.
McCulloh D, Alikani M, Norian J, Kolb B, Arbones J, Munne S . Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) parameters associated with euploidy rates in donor oocytes. Eur J Med Genet. 2019; 62(8):103707. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.103707. View