» Articles » PMID: 32987008

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in COVID-19: an International Cohort Study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry

Abstract

Background: Multiple major health organisations recommend the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. However, initial reports of ECMO use in patients with COVID-19 described very high mortality and there have been no large, international cohort studies of ECMO for COVID-19 reported to date.

Methods: We used data from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry to characterise the epidemiology, hospital course, and outcomes of patients aged 16 years or older with confirmed COVID-19 who had ECMO support initiated between Jan 16 and May 1, 2020, at 213 hospitals in 36 countries. The primary outcome was in-hospital death in a time-to-event analysis assessed at 90 days after ECMO initiation. We applied a multivariable Cox model to examine whether patient and hospital factors were associated with in-hospital mortality.

Findings: Data for 1035 patients with COVID-19 who received ECMO support were included in this study. Of these, 67 (6%) remained hospitalised, 311 (30%) were discharged home or to an acute rehabilitation centre, 101 (10%) were discharged to a long-term acute care centre or unspecified location, 176 (17%) were discharged to another hospital, and 380 (37%) died. The estimated cumulative incidence of in-hospital mortality 90 days after the initiation of ECMO was 37·4% (95% CI 34·4-40·4). Mortality was 39% (380 of 968) in patients with a final disposition of death or hospital discharge. The use of ECMO for circulatory support was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio 1·89, 95% CI 1·20-2·97). In the subset of patients with COVID-19 receiving respiratory (venovenous) ECMO and characterised as having acute respiratory distress syndrome, the estimated cumulative incidence of in-hospital mortality 90 days after the initiation of ECMO was 38·0% (95% CI 34·6-41·5).

Interpretation: In patients with COVID-19 who received ECMO, both estimated mortality 90 days after ECMO and mortality in those with a final disposition of death or discharge were less than 40%. These data from 213 hospitals worldwide provide a generalisable estimate of ECMO mortality in the setting of COVID-19.

Funding: None.

Citing Articles

Advances in treatment strategies for COVID-19: Insights from other coronavirus diseases and prospects.

Li Y, Lan J, Wong G Biosaf Health. 2025; 5(5):272-279.

PMID: 40078910 PMC: 11895002. DOI: 10.1016/j.bsheal.2023.08.003.


Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): from mechanistic insights to therapeutic strategies.

Xie R, Tan D, Liu B, Xiao G, Gong F, Zhang Q MedComm (2020). 2025; 6(2):e70074.

PMID: 39866839 PMC: 11769712. DOI: 10.1002/mco2.70074.


Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for adults with respiratory failure secondary to cardiorespiratory disease: evolving indications and clinical practice.

Mortimer Ocean N, Patel B, Garfield B Breathe (Sheff). 2025; 21(1):240119.

PMID: 39845438 PMC: 11747881. DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0119-2024.


Progress of extracorporeal centrifugal pumps for mechanical circulatory supports.

Tsukiya T J Artif Organs. 2025; .

PMID: 39775355 DOI: 10.1007/s10047-024-01492-6.


Navigating Heart-Lung Interactions in Mechanical Ventilation: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Advanced Management Strategies in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Beyond.

Zakynthinos G, Tsolaki V, Mantzarlis K, Xanthopoulos A, Oikonomou E, Kalogeras K J Clin Med. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39768712 PMC: 11728210. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247788.


References
1.
Brower R, Matthay M, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson B, Wheeler A . Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342(18):1301-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. View

2.
Benichou J, Gail M . Estimates of absolute cause-specific risk in cohort studies. Biometrics. 1990; 46(3):813-26. View

3.
Munshi L, Walkey A, Goligher E, Pham T, Uleryk E, Fan E . Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2019; 7(2):163-172. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30452-1. View

4.
Barbaro R, Odetola F, Kidwell K, Paden M, Bartlett R, Davis M . Association of hospital-level volume of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases and mortality. Analysis of the extracorporeal life support organization registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015; 191(8):894-901. PMC: 4435456. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201409-1634OC. View

5.
Conrad S, Broman L, Taccone F, Lorusso R, Malfertheiner M, Pappalardo F . The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Maastricht Treaty for Nomenclature in Extracorporeal Life Support. A Position Paper of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018; 198(4):447-451. PMC: 6118026. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201710-2130CP. View