» Articles » PMID: 32912947

Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST): Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate Invitation to Community-based Low-dose CT Screening for Lung Cancer Versus Usual Care in a Targeted Population at Risk

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer is the world's leading cause of cancer death. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening reduced lung cancer mortality by 20% in the US National Lung Screening Trial. Here, we present the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST), which will address key questions of relevance for screening implementation.

Methods And Analysis: Using a single-consent Zelen's design, ever-smokers aged 55-80 years registered with a general practice in Leeds will be randomised (1:1) to invitation to a telephone-based risk-assessment for a Lung Health Check or to usual care. The anticipated number randomised by household is 62 980 individuals. Responders at high risk will be invited for LDCT scanning for lung cancer on a mobile van in the community. There will be two rounds of screening at an interval of 2 years. Primary objectives are (1) measure participation rates, (2) compare the performance of PLCO (threshold ≥1.51%), Liverpool Lung Project (V.2) (threshold ≥5%) and US Preventive Services Task Force eligibility criteria for screening population selection and (3) assess lung cancer outcomes in the intervention and usual care arms. Secondary evaluations include health economics, quality of life, smoking rates according to intervention arm, screening programme performance with ancillary biomarker and smoking cessation studies.

Ethics And Dissemination: The study has been approved by the Greater Manchester West research ethics committee (18-NW-0012) and the Health Research Authority following review by the Confidentiality Advisory Group. The results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals, presentation at conferences and on the YLST website.

Trial Registration Numbers: ISRCTN42704678 and NCT03750110.

Citing Articles

Six-year performance of risk-based selection for lung cancer screening in the Manchester Lung Health Check cohort.

Goodley P, Balata H, Robbins H, Booton R, Sperrin M, Crosbie P BMJ Oncol. 2025; 3(1):e000560.

PMID: 40046247 PMC: 11880782. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000560.


Protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis for risk factors for lung cancer in individuals with lung nodules identified by low-dose CT screening.

Alexandris P, Quaife S, Berg C, Callister M, Crosbie P, Davies M BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e085118.

PMID: 39863408 PMC: 11784322. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085118.


Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of risk model-based and risk factor-based low-dose computed tomography screening strategies for lung cancer: a systematic review.

Liu Y, Geng Q, Lin X, Feng C, Qiao Y, Zhang S BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1567.

PMID: 39710662 PMC: 11665239. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-13356-6.


Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening with volume computed tomography in Portugal.

Ten Berge H, Togka K, Pan X, Borges M, Martelo F, Guedes F J Comp Eff Res. 2024; 13(11):e240102.

PMID: 39329332 PMC: 11542083. DOI: 10.57264/cer-2024-0102.


Software using artificial intelligence for nodule and cancer detection in CT lung cancer screening: systematic review of test accuracy studies.

Geppert J, Asgharzadeh A, Brown A, Stinton C, Helm E, Jayakody S Thorax. 2024; 79(11):1040-1049.

PMID: 39322406 PMC: 11503082. DOI: 10.1136/thorax-2024-221662.


References
1.
Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller S . A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996; 34(3):220-33. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. View

2.
Moyer V . Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 160(5):330-8. DOI: 10.7326/M13-2771. View

3.
McWilliams A, Tammemagi M, Mayo J, Roberts H, Liu G, Soghrati K . Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(10):910-9. PMC: 3951177. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214726. View

4.
de Koning H, van der Aalst C, de Jong P, Scholten E, Nackaerts K, Heuvelmans M . Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(6):503-513. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911793. View

5.
Gracie K, Kennedy M, Esterbrook G, Smith G, Blaxill P, Ameri A . The proportion of lung cancer patients attending UK lung cancer clinics who would have been eligible for low-dose CT screening. Eur Respir J. 2019; 54(2). DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02221-2018. View