» Articles » PMID: 32909959

Reporting Guidelines for Clinical Trial Reports for Interventions Involving Artificial Intelligence: the CONSORT-AI Extension

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Sep 10
PMID 32909959
Citations 118
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The CONSORT 2010 (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement provides minimum guidelines for reporting randomised trials. Its widespread use has been instrumental in ensuring transparency when evaluating new interventions. More recently, there has been a growing recognition that interventions involving artificial intelligence (AI) need to undergo rigorous, prospective evaluation to demonstrate impact on health outcomes.The CONSORT-AI extension is a new reporting guideline for clinical trials evaluating interventions with an AI component. It was developed in parallel with its companion statement for clinical trial protocols: SPIRIT-AI. Both guidelines were developed through a staged consensus process, involving a literature review and expert consultation to generate 29 candidate items, which were assessed by an international multi-stakeholder group in a two-stage Delphi survey (103 stakeholders), agreed on in a two-day consensus meeting (31 stakeholders) and refined through a checklist pilot (34 participants).The CONSORT-AI extension includes 14 new items, which were considered sufficiently important for AI interventions, that they should be routinely reported in addition to the core CONSORT 2010 items. CONSORT-AI recommends that investigators provide clear descriptions of the AI intervention, including instructions and skills required for use, the setting in which the AI intervention is integrated, the handling of inputs and outputs of the AI intervention, the human-AI interaction and providing analysis of error cases.CONSORT-AI will help promote transparency and completeness in reporting clinical trials for AI interventions. It will assist editors and peer-reviewers, as well as the general readership, to understand, interpret and critically appraise the quality of clinical trial design and risk of bias in the reported outcomes.

Citing Articles

Predicting Surgical Difficulty in Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Models Applied to Pre-Operative MRI.

Hardacre C, Hibbs T, Fok M, Wiles R, Bashar N, Ahmed S Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075659 PMC: 11899449. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050812.


Effect of an unsupervised multidomain intervention integrating education, exercises, psychological techniques and machine learning feedback, on injury risk reduction in athletics (track and field): protocol of a randomised controlled trial....

Iatropoulos S, Dandrieux P, Blanco D, Ruffault A, Gignoux E, Mosser C BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2025; 11(1):e002501.

PMID: 39990118 PMC: 11843022. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002501.


AI-Assisted Tailored Intervention for Nurse Burnout: A Three-Group Randomized Controlled Trial.

Baek G, Cha C Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2025; 22(1):e70003.

PMID: 39981583 PMC: 11843407. DOI: 10.1111/wvn.70003.


Discrepancies in reported results between trial registries and journal articles for AI clinical research.

He Z, Yang L, Li X, Du J EClinicalMedicine. 2025; 80:103066.

PMID: 39963161 PMC: 11831125. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103066.


Clinical trials informed framework for real world clinical implementation and deployment of artificial intelligence applications.

You J, Hernandez-Boussard T, Pfeffer M, Landman A, Mishuris R NPJ Digit Med. 2025; 8(1):107.

PMID: 39962232 PMC: 11832725. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-025-01506-4.


References
1.
Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, Wager E, Middleton P, Altman D . CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet. 2008; 371(9609):281-3. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61835-2. View

2.
Glasziou P, Altman D, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S . Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet. 2014; 383(9913):267-76. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X. View

3.
Collins G, Moons K . Reporting of artificial intelligence prediction models. Lancet. 2019; 393(10181):1577-1579. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30037-6. View

4.
Juni P, Altman D, Egger M . Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001; 323(7303):42-6. PMC: 1120670. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42. View

5.
Lin H, Li R, Liu Z, Chen J, Yang Y, Chen H . Diagnostic Efficacy and Therapeutic Decision-making Capacity of an Artificial Intelligence Platform for Childhood Cataracts in Eye Clinics: A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2019; 9:52-59. PMC: 6510889. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.03.001. View