» Articles » PMID: 32047862

An Overview of Clinical Decision Support Systems: Benefits, Risks, and Strategies for Success

Overview
Journal NPJ Digit Med
Date 2020 Feb 13
PMID 32047862
Citations 632
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Computerized clinical decision support systems, or CDSS, represent a paradigm shift in healthcare today. CDSS are used to augment clinicians in their complex decision-making processes. Since their first use in the 1980s, CDSS have seen a rapid evolution. They are now commonly administered through electronic medical records and other computerized clinical workflows, which has been facilitated by increasing global adoption of electronic medical records with advanced capabilities. Despite these advances, there remain unknowns regarding the effect CDSS have on the providers who use them, patient outcomes, and costs. There have been numerous published examples in the past decade(s) of CDSS success stories, but notable setbacks have also shown us that CDSS are not without risks. In this paper, we provide a state-of-the-art overview on the use of clinical decision support systems in medicine, including the different types, current use cases with proven efficacy, common pitfalls, and potential harms. We conclude with evidence-based recommendations for minimizing risk in CDSS design, implementation, evaluation, and maintenance.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive overview of artificial intelligence in surgery: a systematic review and perspectives.

Chevalier O, Dubey G, Benkabbou A, Majbar M, Souadka A Pflugers Arch. 2025; .

PMID: 40087157 DOI: 10.1007/s00424-025-03076-6.


The Value of Clinical Decision Support in Healthcare: A Focus on Screening and Early Detection.

Schafer H, Lajmi N, Valente P, Pedrioli A, Cigoianu D, Hoehne B Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075895 PMC: 11899545. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15050648.


Design and Evaluation of ACAFiB-APP, a clinical decision support system for anticoagulant considerations in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Ansari R, Rezayi S, Safaei A, Mollazadeh R, Rezaei E, Mafinejad M BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025; 25(1):166.

PMID: 40057691 PMC: 11889798. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-025-04615-w.


Application of machine learning techniques in GlaucomAI system for glaucoma diagnosis and collaborative research support.

Swierczynski H, Pukacki J, Szczesny S, Mazurek C, Wasilewicz R Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7940.

PMID: 40050329 PMC: 11885539. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89893-2.


Implementing Clinical Practice Guidelines: Considerations for Epileptologists.

Gutierrez C, Roberson S, Esmaeili B, Punia V, Johnson E Epilepsy Curr. 2025; :15357597251318536.

PMID: 40040859 PMC: 11873851. DOI: 10.1177/15357597251318536.


References
1.
Vonbach P, Dubied A, Krahenbuhl S, Beer J . Prevalence of drug-drug interactions at hospital entry and during hospital stay of patients in internal medicine. Eur J Intern Med. 2008; 19(6):413-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.12.002. View

2.
Tsolaki E, Svolos P, Kousi E, Kapsalaki E, Fezoulidis I, Fountas K . Fast spectroscopic multiple analysis (FASMA) for brain tumor classification: a clinical decision support system utilizing multi-parametric 3T MR data. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014; 10(7):1149-66. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-014-1088-7. View

3.
Calloway S, Akilo H, Bierman K . Impact of a clinical decision support system on pharmacy clinical interventions, documentation efforts, and costs. Hosp Pharm. 2014; 48(9):744-52. PMC: 3857121. DOI: 10.1310/hpj4809-744. View

4.
Davis S, Roudsari A, Raworth R, Courtney K, MacKay L . Shared decision-making using personal health record technology: a scoping review at the crossroads. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017; 24(4):857-866. PMC: 7651971. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocw172. View

5.
Nohr C, Parv L, Kink P, Cummings E, Almond H, Norgaard J . Nationwide citizen access to their health data: analysing and comparing experiences in Denmark, Estonia and Australia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17(1):534. PMC: 5547535. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2482-y. View