» Articles » PMID: 39379046

Patient-Centric In Vitro Fertilization Prognostic Counseling Using Machine Learning for the Pragmatist

Overview
Date 2024 Oct 8
PMID 39379046
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although in vitro fertilization (IVF) has become an extremely effective treatment option for infertility, there is significant underutilization of IVF by patients who could benefit from such treatment. In order for patients to choose to consider IVF treatment when appropriate, it is critical for them to be provided with an accurate, understandable IVF prognosis. Machine learning (ML) can meet the challenge of personalized prognostication based on data available prior to treatment. The development, validation, and deployment of ML prognostic models and related patient counseling report delivery require specialized human and platform expertise. This review article takes a pragmatic approach to review relevant reports of IVF prognostic models and draws from extensive experience meeting patients' and providers' needs with the development of data and model pipelines to implement validated ML models at scale, at the point-of-care. Requirements of using ML-based IVF prognostics at point-of-care will be considered alongside clinical ML implementation factors critical for success. Finally, we discuss health, social, and economic objectives that may be achieved by leveraging combined human expertise and ML prognostics to expand fertility care access and advance health and social good.

References
1.
Vaegter K, Ghukasyan Lakic T, Olovsson M, Berglund L, Brodin T, Holte J . Which factors are most predictive for live birth after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatments? Analysis of 100 prospectively recorded variables in 8,400 IVF/ICSI single-embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107(3):641-648.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.005. View

2.
Metello J, Tomas C, Ferreira P . Can we predict the IVF/ICSI live birth rate?. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019; 23(4):402-407. PMC: 6798599. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190043. View

3.
Grzegorczyk-Martin V, Roset J, Di Pizio P, Freour T, Barriere P, Pouly J . Adaptive data-driven models to best predict the likelihood of live birth as the IVF cycle moves on and for each embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022; 39(8):1937-1949. PMC: 9428070. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02547-4. View

4.
Vassena R . Moonshots and last miles: what it may take to treat infertility for all. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023; 48(2):103642. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103642. View

5.
Vasey B, Nagendran M, Campbell B, Clifton D, Collins G, Denaxas S . Reporting guideline for the early stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI. BMJ. 2022; 377:e070904. PMC: 9116198. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070904. View