» Articles » PMID: 32904492

The Impact of E-cycling on Travel Behaviour: A Scoping Review

Overview
Journal J Transp Health
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2020 Sep 9
PMID 32904492
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Electrically assisted bicycles (e-bikes) have become increasingly popular in the past decade. This review aimed to scope the literature to identify what is known about the frequency and duration of e-bike use, their impact on travel behaviour, the purposes for which e-bikes are used and factors associated with e-bike use. In addition, the review aimed to identify gaps in the literature and highlight future research priorities.

Methods: A scoping review of published and unpublished literature in any language. Relevant articles were identified through searching six databases, two grey literature platforms and reference lists. Searches were conducted until August 2019. Data were extracted using a standardised extraction form and descriptive and narrative results are provided.

Results: Seventy-six studies met the inclusion criteria. The volume of research has increased since 2017 and primarily examines personal e-bike use, as opposed to e-bike share/rental schemes or organizational e-bike initiatives. The use of e-bikes increased the frequency and duration of cycling compared to conventional cycling and may help overcome barriers associated with conventional cycling. The uptake in e-cycling largely substitutes for conventional cycling or private car journeys, though the degree of substitution depends on the primary transport mode prior to e-bike acquisition. E-bikes are primarily used for utilitarian reasons, though older adults also engage in recreational e-cycling. Research priorities include quantitatively examining e-bike use, their impact on overall transport behaviour and identifying determinants of e-cycling to inform intervention and policy.

Conclusions: This review suggests that the personal use of e-bikes is associated with a reduction in motorized vehicle use, which has potential positive impacts on the environment and health. The impacts of e-bike share schemes and workplace initiatives are less well understood. Evidence describing the purposes for which e-bikes are used, and the factors associated with usage, are useful to inform e-cycling promotion policy.

Citing Articles

A Theory and Evidence-Informed e-Cycling Intervention for Individuals Diagnosed With Cancer: Development Study.

Bourne J, Kelly P, Armstrong M JMIR Cancer. 2024; 10:e54785.

PMID: 39151159 PMC: 11364947. DOI: 10.2196/54785.


Built and natural environment correlates of physical activity of adults living in rural areas: a systematic review.

Muller C, Paulsen L, Bucksch J, Wallmann-Sperlich B Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024; 21(1):52.

PMID: 38702772 PMC: 11067138. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01598-3.


Less car, more bicycle? Generation Y as pioneers of changing everyday mobility in Germany.

Konietzka D, Neugebauer L Eur Transp Res Rev. 2024; 15(1):2.

PMID: 38625355 PMC: 9885390. DOI: 10.1186/s12544-023-00575-4.


Short term e-bicycle riding results in favorable cardiometabolic shifts in moderately active adults.

Alessio H, Ballard K, Reidy P, Hayward K, Bagg A, Cooley R Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024; 124(7):1969-1977.

PMID: 38300319 PMC: 11199247. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-024-05418-1.


''I felt marvellous e-cycling. If I had long hair I would have flicked it": a qualitative investigation of the factors associated with e-cycling engagement among adults with type 2 diabetes.

Bourne J, Leary S, England C, Searle A Front Sports Act Living. 2023; 5:1150724.

PMID: 37841890 PMC: 10570523. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1150724.


References
1.
Strain T, Fitzsimons C, Foster C, Mutrie N, Townsend N, Kelly P . Age-related comparisons by sex in the domains of aerobic physical activity for adults in Scotland. Prev Med Rep. 2016; 3:90-7. PMC: 4733093. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.12.013. View

2.
Leyland L, Spencer B, Beale N, Jones T, van Reekum C . The effect of cycling on cognitive function and well-being in older adults. PLoS One. 2019; 14(2):e0211779. PMC: 6388745. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211779. View

3.
Fishman E, Bocker L, Helbich M . Adult active transport in the Netherlands: an analysis of its contribution to physical activity requirements. PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0121871. PMC: 4388541. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121871. View

4.
Stenner H, Boyen J, Hein M, Protte G, Kuck M, Finkel A . Everyday Pedelec Use and Its Effect on Meeting Physical Activity Guidelines. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(13). PMC: 7370133. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17134807. View

5.
Fuglestvedt J, Berntsen T, Myhre G, Rypdal K, Skeie R . Climate forcing from the transport sectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(2):454-8. PMC: 2206557. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0702958104. View