» Articles » PMID: 37072802

Electrically Assisted Cycling for Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Apr 19
PMID 37072802
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its associated complications puts considerable strain on healthcare systems. With the global incidence of T2DM increasing, effective disease management is essential. Physical activity (PA) is a key component of T2DM management; however, rates of PA engagement are low in this population. Developing effective and sustainable interventions that encourage PA is a high priority. Electrically assisted bicycles are becoming increasingly popular and may increase PA in healthy adults. This study aimed to provide evidence of the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of an e-cycling intervention to increase PA and improve health in individuals with T2DM.

Methods: A parallel-group two-arm randomized, waitlist-controlled pilot study was conducted. Individuals were randomized to either an e-bike intervention or standard care. The intervention incorporated two one-to-one e-bike skills training and behavioural counselling sessions delivered by a community-based cycling charity, followed by a 12-week e-bike loan with two further sessions with the instructors. Feasibility was assessed via measures related to recruitment, retention and intervention implementation. Post-intervention interviews with instructors and participants explored the acceptability of the study procedures and intervention. Clinical, physiological and behavioural outcomes were collected at baseline and post-intervention to evaluate the intervention's potential.

Results: Forty participants (M = 57) were randomized, of which 34 were recruited from primary care practices. Thirty-five participants were retained in the trial. The intervention was conducted with high fidelity (> 80% content delivered). E-bike training provided participants with the skills, knowledge and confidence needed to e-bike independently. Instructors reported being more confident delivering the skills training than behavioural counselling, despite acknowledging its importance. The study procedures were found to be acceptable to participants. Between-group differences in change during the intervention were indicative of the interventions potential for improving glucose control, health-related quality of life and cardiorespiratory fitness. Increases in overall device measured moderate-to-vigorous PA behaviour following the intervention were found, and there was evidence that this population self-selected to e-cycle at a moderate intensity.

Conclusions: The study's recruitment, retention, acceptability and potential efficacy support the development of a definitive trial subject to identified refinements.

Trial Registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN67421464 . Registered 17/12/2018.

Citing Articles

Potential for Increasing Physical Activity through an e-Bike Pilot Program to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Goins K, Salcedo A, Mook G, Lemon S J Healthy Eat Act Living. 2025; 5(1):64-75.

PMID: 40060769 PMC: 11887922.


A Theory and Evidence-Informed e-Cycling Intervention for Individuals Diagnosed With Cancer: Development Study.

Bourne J, Kelly P, Armstrong M JMIR Cancer. 2024; 10:e54785.

PMID: 39151159 PMC: 11364947. DOI: 10.2196/54785.


''I felt marvellous e-cycling. If I had long hair I would have flicked it": a qualitative investigation of the factors associated with e-cycling engagement among adults with type 2 diabetes.

Bourne J, Leary S, England C, Searle A Front Sports Act Living. 2023; 5:1150724.

PMID: 37841890 PMC: 10570523. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1150724.


Study protocol for two pilot randomised controlled trials aimed at increasing physical activity using electrically assisted bicycles to enhance prostate or breast cancer survival.

Bourne J, Foster C, Forte C, Aning J, Potter S, Hart E Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023; 9(1):68.

PMID: 37095588 PMC: 10124052. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01293-3.

References
1.
Thomas E, Battaglia G, Patti A, Brusa J, Leonardi V, Palma A . Physical activity programs for balance and fall prevention in elderly: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(27):e16218. PMC: 6635278. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016218. View

2.
Crouter S, Churilla J, Bassett Jr D . Accuracy of the Actiheart for the assessment of energy expenditure in adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007; 62(6):704-11. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602766. View

3.
Colberg S, Sigal R, Fernhall B, Regensteiner J, Blissmer B, Rubin R . Exercise and type 2 diabetes: the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Diabetes Association: joint position statement. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(12):e147-67. PMC: 2992225. DOI: 10.2337/dc10-9990. View

4.
Walton H, Spector A, Tombor I, Michie S . Measures of fidelity of delivery of, and engagement with, complex, face-to-face health behaviour change interventions: A systematic review of measure quality. Br J Health Psychol. 2017; 22(4):872-903. PMC: 5655766. DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12260. View

5.
Morrato E, Hill J, Wyatt H, Ghushchyan V, Sullivan P . Physical activity in U.S. adults with diabetes and at risk for developing diabetes, 2003. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30(2):203-9. DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1128. View