False Positive PSMA PET for Tumor Remnants in the Irradiated Prostate and Other Interpretation Pitfalls in a Prospective Multi-center Trial
Overview
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: Readers need to be informed about potential pitfalls of [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET interpretation.
Methods: Here we report [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET findings discordant with the histopathology/composite reference standard in a recently published prospective trial on 635 patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.
Results: Consensus reads were false positive in 20 regions of 17/217 (8%) patients with lesion validation. Majority of the false positive interpretations (13 of 20, 65%) occurred in the context of suspected prostate (bed) relapse (T) after radiotherapy (n = 11); other false positive findings were noted for prostate bed post prostatectomy (T, n = 2), pelvic nodes (N, n = 2), or extra pelvic lesions (M, n = 5). Major sources of false positive findings were PSMA-expressing residual adenocarcinoma with marked post-radiotherapy treatment effect. False negative interpretation occurred in 8 regions of 6/79 (8%) patients with histopathology validation, including prostate (bed) (n = 5), pelvic nodes (n = 1), and extra pelvic lesions (n = 2). Lesions were missed mostly due to small metastases or adjacent bladder/urine uptake.
Conclusion: [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET at biochemical recurrence resulted in less than 10% false positive interpretations. Post-radiotherapy prostate uptake was a major source of [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET false positivity. In few cases, PET correctly detects residual PSMA expression post-radiotherapy, originating however from treated, benign tissue or potentially indolent tumor remnants.
Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02940262 and NCT03353740.
Saripalli A, Venkatesulu B, Nickols N, Valle L, Harkenrider M, Kishan A World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):520.
PMID: 39264453 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05205-9.
Muglia V, Laschena L, Pecoraro M, de Lion Gouvea G, Colli L, Panebianco V Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 50(2):807-826.
PMID: 39254707 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04412-7.
Wen X, Wang R, Xu P, Shi M, Shang Q, Zeng X Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(7):2023-2035.
PMID: 38376806 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06634-9.
Predicting F-DCFPyL-PET/CT Scan Positivity in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence.
Lee K, Mena E, Shih J, Lindenberg L, Wood B, Pinto P Acad Radiol. 2023; 31(4):1419-1428.
PMID: 37775447 PMC: 10965502. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.09.002.
Application of next-generation imaging in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.
Moul J, Shore N, Pienta K, Czernin J, King M, Freedland S Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023; 27(2):202-211.
PMID: 37679601 PMC: 11096127. DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00711-0.