» Articles » PMID: 32808077

False Positive PSMA PET for Tumor Remnants in the Irradiated Prostate and Other Interpretation Pitfalls in a Prospective Multi-center Trial

Abstract

Purpose: Readers need to be informed about potential pitfalls of [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET interpretation.

Methods: Here we report [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET findings discordant with the histopathology/composite reference standard in a recently published prospective trial on 635 patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.

Results: Consensus reads were false positive in 20 regions of 17/217 (8%) patients with lesion validation. Majority of the false positive interpretations (13 of 20, 65%) occurred in the context of suspected prostate (bed) relapse (T) after radiotherapy (n = 11); other false positive findings were noted for prostate bed post prostatectomy (T, n = 2), pelvic nodes (N, n = 2), or extra pelvic lesions (M, n = 5). Major sources of false positive findings were PSMA-expressing residual adenocarcinoma with marked post-radiotherapy treatment effect. False negative interpretation occurred in 8 regions of 6/79 (8%) patients with histopathology validation, including prostate (bed) (n = 5), pelvic nodes (n = 1), and extra pelvic lesions (n = 2). Lesions were missed mostly due to small metastases or adjacent bladder/urine uptake.

Conclusion: [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET at biochemical recurrence resulted in less than 10% false positive interpretations. Post-radiotherapy prostate uptake was a major source of [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET false positivity. In few cases, PET correctly detects residual PSMA expression post-radiotherapy, originating however from treated, benign tissue or potentially indolent tumor remnants.

Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02940262 and NCT03353740.

Citing Articles

Systematic review and recommendations for re-irradiation for intraprostatic radiorecurrent prostate cancer after definitive radiation therapy.

Saripalli A, Venkatesulu B, Nickols N, Valle L, Harkenrider M, Kishan A World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):520.

PMID: 39264453 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05205-9.


Imaging assessment of prostate cancer recurrence: advances in detection of local and systemic relapse.

Muglia V, Laschena L, Pecoraro M, de Lion Gouvea G, Colli L, Panebianco V Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 50(2):807-826.

PMID: 39254707 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04412-7.


Synthesis, preclinical, and initial clinical evaluation of integrin αβ and gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) dual-targeting radiotracer [Ga]Ga-RGD-RM26-03.

Wen X, Wang R, Xu P, Shi M, Shang Q, Zeng X Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(7):2023-2035.

PMID: 38376806 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06634-9.


Predicting F-DCFPyL-PET/CT Scan Positivity in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence.

Lee K, Mena E, Shih J, Lindenberg L, Wood B, Pinto P Acad Radiol. 2023; 31(4):1419-1428.

PMID: 37775447 PMC: 10965502. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.09.002.


Application of next-generation imaging in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.

Moul J, Shore N, Pienta K, Czernin J, King M, Freedland S Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023; 27(2):202-211.

PMID: 37679601 PMC: 11096127. DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00711-0.


References
1.
Fennessy N, Lee J, Shin J, Ho B, Aman Ali S, Paschkewitz R . Frusemide aids diagnostic interpretation of Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/CT in men with prostate cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017; 61(6):739-744. DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12625. View

2.
Ploussard G, Almeras C, Briganti A, Giannarini G, Hennequin C, Ost P . Management of Node Only Recurrence after Primary Local Treatment for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Urol. 2015; 194(4):983-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.103. View

3.
Crook J, Malone S, Perry G, Eapen L, Owen J, Robertson S . Twenty-four-month postradiation prostate biopsies are strongly predictive of 7-year disease-free survival: results from a Canadian randomized trial. Cancer. 2009; 115(3):673-9. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24020. View

4.
Eiber M, Herrmann K, Calais J, Hadaschik B, Giesel F, Hartenbach M . Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE): Proposed miTNM Classification for the Interpretation of PSMA-Ligand PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2017; 59(3):469-478. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.198119. View

5.
von Eyben F, Picchio M, von Eyben R, Rhee H, Bauman G . Ga-Labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2017; 4(5):686-693. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.11.002. View