» Articles » PMID: 35155262

PSMA PET in Imaging Prostate Cancer

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Feb 14
PMID 35155262
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

After prostate malignancy diagnosis, precise determination of disease extent are fundamental steps for tailored made therapy. The earlier the diagnosis of the burden of the disease, the longer the survival in many cases. National and international guidelines are based on "classic" imaging technics combining radiological and nuclear medicine scans like CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy (BS). The most recent nuclear medicine development is the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET and is emerging as the most promising tool of medical imaging, gaining ground every day. Nevertheless, the different onset among multiple studies fails to establish a worldwide admission and incorporation of this technique in guidelines and its position in workaday medical algorithms. It seems that the medical community agrees not to utilize PSMA PET for low-risk patients; intense debate and research is ongoing for its utility in intermediate risk patients. Contrariwise, in high-risk patients PSMA PET is confirmed outperforming CT and BS combined. Additionally, irrespectively to their castration status, patients with biochemical failure should be referred for PSMA PET. Even though PSMA PET reveals more extended disease than expected or exonerates equivalent lesions, thus impacting treatment optimization. Studies being in progress and future trials with clarify whether PSMA PET will be the new gold standard technic for specific groups of patients.

Citing Articles

Genomic characterization of metastatic patterns in prostate cancer using circulating tumor DNA data from the SCRUM-Japan MONSTAR SCREEN project.

Shiota M, Matsubara N, Kato T, Eto M, Osawa T, Abe T J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 7:100282.

PMID: 40027233 PMC: 11863810. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2024.100282.


Recommendations from Imaging, Oncology, and Radiology Organizations to Guide Management in Prostate Cancer: Summary of Current Recommendations.

Mew A, Chau E, Bera K, Ramaiya N, Tirumani S Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025; 7(1):e240091.

PMID: 39792015 PMC: 11791666. DOI: 10.1148/rycan.240091.


PRIMARY scoring in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: correlation with prostate cancer risk groups and its potential impact on active surveillance.

Uslu H, Sahin D, Ibisoglu E, Tatoglu M Ann Nucl Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39579268 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-024-02004-5.


Advanced single-cell and spatial analysis with high-multiplex characterization of circulating tumor cells and tumor tissue in prostate cancer: Unveiling resistance mechanisms with the CoDuCo in situ assay.

Bonstingl L, Zinnegger M, Sallinger K, Pankratz K, Muller C, Pritz E Biomark Res. 2024; 12(1):140.

PMID: 39550585 PMC: 11568690. DOI: 10.1186/s40364-024-00680-z.


Current trends in the characterization and monitoring of vascular response to cancer therapy.

Shrestha B, Stern N, Zhou A, Dunn A, Porter T Cancer Imaging. 2024; 24(1):143.

PMID: 39438891 PMC: 11515715. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00767-8.


References
1.
Bianchi L, Schiavina R, Borghesi M, Ceci F, Angiolini A, Chessa F . How does Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography impact the management of patients with prostate cancer recurrence after surgery?. Int J Urol. 2019; 26(8):804-811. DOI: 10.1111/iju.14012. View

2.
Schiavina R, Bianchi L, Bunocilla E . PSMA PET/CT to stage high-risk prostate cancer: is already the time to replace conventional imaging?. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021; 73(1):135-136. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04343-5. View

3.
Zamboglou C, Carles M, Fechter T, Kiefer S, Reichel K, Fassbender T . Radiomic features from PSMA PET for non-invasive intraprostatic tumor discrimination and characterization in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer - a comparison study with histology reference. Theranostics. 2019; 9(9):2595-2605. PMC: 6525993. DOI: 10.7150/thno.32376. View

4.
Treglia G, Mestre R, Ferrari M, Bosetti D, Pascale M, Oikonomou E . Radiolabelled choline versus PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer restaging: a meta-analysis. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019; 9(2):127-139. PMC: 6526363. View

5.
Rauscher I, Duwel C, Haller B, Rischpler C, Heck M, Gschwend J . Efficacy, Predictive Factors, and Prediction Nomograms for Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-ligand Positron-emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Early Biochemical Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2018; 73(5):656-661. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.006. View