» Articles » PMID: 35015566

Considerations on Integrating Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Into Clinical Prostate Cancer Trials by National Clinical Trials Network Cooperative Groups

Abstract

Purpose: As prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) becomes increasingly available in the United States, the greater sensitivity of the technology in comparison to conventional imaging poses challenges for clinical trials. The NCI Clinical Imaging Steering Committee (CISC) PSMA PET Working Group was convened to coordinate the identification of these challenges in various clinical scenarios and to develop consensus recommendations on how best to integrate PSMA PET into ongoing and upcoming National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) trials.

Methods: NCI CISC and NCI Genitourinary Steering Committee members and leadership nominated clinicians, biostatisticians, patient advocates, and other imaging experts for inclusion in the PSMA PET Working Group. From April to July 2021, the working group met independently and in conjunction with the CISC to frame challenges, including stage migration, response assessment, trial logistics, and statistical challenges, and to discuss proposed solutions. An anonymous, open-ended survey was distributed to members to collect feedback on challenges faced. Representatives from each NCTN group were invited to present an overview of affected trials. From these discussions, the consensus document was developed and circulated for the inclusion of multiple rounds of feedback from both the Working Group and CISC.

Results: The current consensus document outlines the key challenges for clinical prostate cancer trials resulting from the increasing availability of PSMA PET. We discuss implications for patient selection and definition of end points and provide guidance and potential solutions for different clinical scenarios, particularly with regard to best practices in defining eligibility criteria and outcome measures.

Recommendations: This article provides guidance regarding clinical trial design and conduct, and the interpretation of trial results.

Citing Articles

The quantitative impact of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT staging in newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer and treatment-decision implications.

Abdel-Aty H, Hujairi N, Murray I, Yogeswaran Y, van As N, James N BJR Open. 2024; 6(1):tzae040.

PMID: 39606160 PMC: 11601884. DOI: 10.1093/bjro/tzae040.


Clinical and Genomic Differences Between Advanced Molecular Imaging-detected and Conventional Imaging-detected Metachronous Oligometastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Sutera P, Song Y, Van der Eecken K, Shetty A, English K, Hodges T Eur Urol. 2023; 84(6):531-535.

PMID: 37173210 PMC: 10636237. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.025.


Radiotheranostics in advanced prostate cancer: Current and future directions.

Jia A, Kiess A, Li Q, Antonarakis E Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023; 27(1):11-21.

PMID: 37069330 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00670-6.


Synthetic biology-inspired cell engineering in diagnosis, treatment, and drug development.

Zhao N, Song Y, Xie X, Zhu Z, Duan C, Nong C Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023; 8(1):112.

PMID: 36906608 PMC: 10007681. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-023-01375-x.


Addressing Challenges and Controversies in the Management of Prostate Cancer with Multidisciplinary Teams.

Shore N, Morgans A, El-Haddad G, Srinivas S, Abramowitz M Target Oncol. 2022; 17(6):709-725.

PMID: 36399218 PMC: 9672595. DOI: 10.1007/s11523-022-00925-7.


References
1.
Scher H, Morris M, Stadler W, Higano C, Basch E, Fizazi K . Trial Design and Objectives for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(12):1402-18. PMC: 4872347. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.2702. View

2.
Shagera Q, Artigas C, Karfis I, Critchi G, Martinez Chanza N, Sideris S . Ga-PSMA PET/CT for Response Assessment and Outcome Prediction in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Taxane-Based Chemotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2021; 63(8):1191-1198. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263006. View

3.
Phillips R, Shi W, Deek M, Radwan N, Lim S, Antonarakis E . Outcomes of Observation vs Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The ORIOLE Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020; 6(5):650-659. PMC: 7225913. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0147. View

4.
Fendler W, Calais J, Eiber M, Flavell R, Mishoe A, Feng F . Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy in Localizing Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019; 5(6):856-863. PMC: 6567829. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0096. View

5.
Ceci F, Oprea-Lager D, Emmett L, Adam J, Bomanji J, Czernin J . E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021; 48(5):1626-1638. PMC: 8113168. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05245-y. View