» Articles » PMID: 32807727

Patterns of Cancer Progression of Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer in the ECOG3805 CHAARTED Trial

Abstract

Background: ECOG3805 is a randomized trial of testosterone suppression with or without docetaxel for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Deeper prostate-specific antigen (PSA) suppression is prognostic for outcome. However, the concordance of PSA rise and radiographic progression has not been examined previously in mHSPC, whereas this has been reported in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Objective: To determine the patterns of progression by PSA and radiographic parameters in patients in ECOG3805.

Design, Setting, And Participants: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients in ECOG3805. Patients were classified according to the PSA level at progression (whether PSA level was below 2.0 ng/mL or not) and the type of progression event in the study (either PSA progression as defined by the study with or without clinical progression, or clinical progression alone). Baseline demographics, clinical outcomes, and patterns of progression were compared between the groups.

Results And Limitations: One in eight patients had clinical progression below a PSA level of 2 ng/mL, and approximately 25% developed clinical progression in the absence of confirmed PSA progression. Overall survival from randomization was shorter in patients with clinical progression without confirmed PSA progression than in patients with PSA progression alone as the first progression. Patient demographics at study entry were not predictive of the pattern of progression. Study limitations include its retrospective and post hoc nature.

Conclusions: Clinical progression prior to PSA rise or at low PSA levels is a relatively frequent phenomenon in mHSPC and is associated with poorer overall survival. Further biological and clinical studies of these patients are warranted.

Patient Summary: Reliance on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) alone is an inadequate strategy to monitor patients undergoing treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Prostate cancer can get worse on scans even with low PSA and/or no or small changes in PSA. Imaging should be added to PSA testing to monitor patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Citing Articles

Clinical value of circulating splicing factors in prostate cancer: SRRM1 as a novel predictive biomarker and therapeutic target.

Montero-Hidalgo A, Gomez-Gomez E, Galan-Canete M, Porcel-Pastrana F, Perez-Gomez J, Ortega-Bellido M Mol Ther Oncol. 2025; 32(4):200910.

PMID: 39758250 PMC: 11697196. DOI: 10.1016/j.omton.2024.200910.


GDF15 propeptide promotes bone metastasis of castration-resistant prostate cancer by augmenting the bone microenvironment.

Yamamichi G, Kato T, Arakawa N, Ino Y, Ujike T, Nakano K Biomark Res. 2024; 12(1):147.

PMID: 39587633 PMC: 11590406. DOI: 10.1186/s40364-024-00695-6.


Antiandrogen Withdrawal Syndrome After Discontinuation of Enzalutamide in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Report of Two Clinical Cases and a Literature Review.

Rodrigues P, Faustino C, Mauricio J, Carneiro F Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e63506.

PMID: 39081434 PMC: 11288229. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63506.


Evaluating prostate cancer bone metastases response with whole-body MRI: What we know and still need to know.

Padhani A, Tunariu N, Perez-Lopez R, Tombal B, Lecouvet F Eur Radiol. 2024; 34(12):7564-7566.

PMID: 38902565 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10864-8.


Liquid biopsy to personalize treatment for metastatic prostate cancer.

Lopez-Valcarcel M, Lopez-Campos F, Zafra J, Cienfuegos I, Ferri M, Barrado M Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(5):1531-1549.

PMID: 38883349 PMC: 11170619. DOI: 10.62347/DICU9510.


References
1.
Fizazi K, Carducci M, Smith M, Damiao R, Brown J, Karsh L . Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study. Lancet. 2011; 377(9768):813-22. PMC: 3090685. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62344-6. View

2.
Scher H, Morris M, Stadler W, Higano C, Basch E, Fizazi K . Trial Design and Objectives for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(12):1402-18. PMC: 4872347. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.2702. View

3.
Bryce A, Alumkal J, Armstrong A, Higano C, Iversen P, Sternberg C . Radiographic progression with nonrising PSA in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: post hoc analysis of PREVAIL. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017; 20(2):221-227. PMC: 5435962. DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2016.71. View

4.
Chi K, Agarwal N, Bjartell A, Chung B, Pereira de Santana Gomes A, Given R . Apalutamide for Metastatic, Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381(1):13-24. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903307. View

5.
Bubley G, Carducci M, Dahut W, Dawson N, Daliani D, Eisenberger M . Eligibility and response guidelines for phase II clinical trials in androgen-independent prostate cancer: recommendations from the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17(11):3461-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.11.3461. View