» Articles » PMID: 26244877

Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Background: Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) has been the backbone of treatment for metastatic prostate cancer since the 1940s. We assessed whether concomitant treatment with ADT plus docetaxel would result in longer overall survival than that with ADT alone.

Methods: We assigned men with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer to receive either ADT plus docetaxel (at a dose of 75 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks for six cycles) or ADT alone. The primary objective was to test the hypothesis that the median overall survival would be 33.3% longer among patients receiving docetaxel added to ADT early during therapy than among patients receiving ADT alone.

Results: A total of 790 patients (median age, 63 years) underwent randomization. After a median follow-up of 28.9 months, the median overall survival was 13.6 months longer with ADT plus docetaxel (combination therapy) than with ADT alone (57.6 months vs. 44.0 months; hazard ratio for death in the combination group, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001). The median time to biochemical, symptomatic, or radiographic progression was 20.2 months in the combination group, as compared with 11.7 months in the ADT-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.72; P<0.001). The rate of a prostate-specific antigen level of less than 0.2 ng per milliliter at 12 months was 27.7% in the combination group versus 16.8% in the ADT-alone group (P<0.001). In the combination group, the rate of grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia was 6.2%, the rate of grade 3 or 4 infection with neutropenia was 2.3%, and the rate of grade 3 sensory neuropathy and of grade 3 motor neuropathy was 0.5%.

Conclusions: Six cycles of docetaxel at the beginning of ADT for metastatic prostate cancer resulted in significantly longer overall survival than that with ADT alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00309985.).

Citing Articles

The prognostic role of systemic immune-inflammation index, SII, in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer patients.

Uzun M, Gokcek S, Kaya E, Semiz H Discov Oncol. 2025; 16(1):317.

PMID: 40085163 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-02084-3.


Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibition in Prostate Cancer: Past, Present, and Future.

Siskin M, Economides M, Wise D Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075623 PMC: 11898528. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050774.


Real-World Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Insights From a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Tashkandi E Cancer Manag Res. 2025; 17:419-428.

PMID: 40046653 PMC: 11881765. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S506423.


Impact of Body Mass Index on Survival After Docetaxel Chemotherapy for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Nieder C, Stanisavljevic L, Dalhaug A, Haukland E Cancer Diagn Progn. 2025; 5(2):138-145.

PMID: 40034952 PMC: 11871856. DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10423.


The Predictive Role of the Gleason Score in Determining Prognosis to Systematic Treatment in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Wu Y, Wang S, Lu L, Wu M, Wu P, Hsieh T J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004858 PMC: 11857080. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041326.


References
1.
James N, Spears M, Clarke N, Dearnaley D, de Bono J, Gale J . Survival with Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer in the "Docetaxel Era": Data from 917 Patients in the Control Arm of the STAMPEDE Trial (MRC PR08, CRUK/06/019). Eur Urol. 2014; 67(6):1028-1038. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.032. View

2.
Millikan R, Wen S, Pagliaro L, Brown M, Moomey B, Do K . Phase III trial of androgen ablation with or without three cycles of systemic chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(36):5936-42. PMC: 3864402. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.9830. View

3.
Crawford E, Eisenberger M, McLeod D, Spaulding J, Benson R, Dorr F . A controlled trial of leuprolide with and without flutamide in prostatic carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1989; 321(7):419-24. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198908173210702. View

4.
Tangen C, Hussain M, Higano C, Eisenberger M, Small E, Wilding G . Improved overall survival trends of men with newly diagnosed M1 prostate cancer: a SWOG phase III trial experience (S8494, S8894 and S9346). J Urol. 2012; 188(4):1164-9. PMC: 3481164. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.06.046. View

5.
Therasse P, Arbuck S, Eisenhauer E, Wanders J, Kaplan R, Rubinstein L . New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92(3):205-16. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205. View