» Articles » PMID: 32792919

The Role of Edge-Based and Surface-Based Information in Incidental Category Learning: Evidence From Behavior and Event-Related Potentials

Overview
Date 2020 Aug 15
PMID 32792919
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although it has been demonstrated that edge-based information is more important than surface-based information in incidental category learning, it remains unclear how the two types of information play different roles in incidental category learning. To address this issue, the present study combined behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) techniques in an incidental category learning task in which the categories were defined by either edge- or surface-based features. The results from Experiment 1 showed that participants could simultaneously learn both edge- and surface-based information in incidental category learning, and importantly, there was a larger learning effect for the edge-based category than for the surface-based category. The behavioral results from Experiment 2 replicated those from Experiment 1, and the ERP results further revealed that the stimuli from the edge-based category elicited larger anterior and posterior P2 components than those from the surface-based category, whereas the stimuli from the surface-based category elicited larger anterior N1 and P3 components than those from the edge-based category. Taken together, the results suggest that, although surface-based information might attract more attention during feature detection, edge-based information plays more important roles in evaluating the relevance of information in making a decision in categorization.

Citing Articles

The Visual Advantage Effect in Comparing Uni-Modal and Cross-Modal Probabilistic Category Learning.

Sun X, Fu Q J Intell. 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 38132836 PMC: 10744040. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence11120218.

References
1.
Reber P, Stark C, Squire L . Contrasting cortical activity associated with category memory and recognition memory. Learn Mem. 1999; 5(6):420-8. PMC: 311251. View

2.
Zaki S, Nosofsky R . False prototype enhancement effects in dot pattern categorization. Mem Cognit. 2004; 32(3):390-8. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195833. View

3.
Reber P, Stark C, Squire L . Cortical areas supporting category learning identified using functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(2):747-50. PMC: 18492. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.2.747. View

4.
Luck S, Hillyard S . Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology. 1994; 31(3):291-308. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02218.x. View

5.
Polich J . Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007; 118(10):2128-48. PMC: 2715154. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019. View