» Articles » PMID: 12452581

An Electrophysiological Comparison of Visual Categorization and Recognition Memory

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2002 Nov 28
PMID 12452581
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Object categorization emphasizes the similarities that bind exemplars into categories, whereas recognition memory emphasizes the specific identification of previously encountered exemplars. Mathematical modeling has highlighted similarities in the computational requirements of these tasks, but neuropsychological research has suggested that categorization and recognition may depend on separate brain systems. Following training with families of novel visual shapes (blobs), event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded during both categorization and recognition tasks. ERPs related to early visual processing (N1, 156-200 msec) were sensitive to category membership. Middle latency ERPs (FN400 effects, 300-500 msec) were sensitive to both category membership and old/new differences. Later ERPs (parietal effects, 400-800 msec) were primarily affected by old/new differences. Thus, there was a temporal transition so that earlier processes were more sensitive to categorical discrimination and later processes were more sensitive to recognition-related discrimination. Aspects of these results are consistent with both mathematical modeling and neuropsychological perspectives.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Linguistic Prediction Violations on Downstream Recognition Memory and Sentence Recall.

Hubbard R, Federmeier K J Cogn Neurosci. 2023; 36(1):1-23.

PMID: 37902591 PMC: 10864033. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_02078.


Hypoxia and standing balance.

Debenham M, Smuin J, Grantham T, Ainslie P, Dalton B Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021; 121(4):993-1008.

PMID: 33484334 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-020-04581-5.


Recallable but not recognizable: The influence of semantic priming in recall paradigms.

Ozubko J, Sirianni L, Ahmad F, MacLeod C, Addante R Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021; 21(1):119-143.

PMID: 33409957 PMC: 7994187. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-020-00854-w.


The Role of Edge-Based and Surface-Based Information in Incidental Category Learning: Evidence From Behavior and Event-Related Potentials.

Zhou X, Fu Q, Rose M Front Integr Neurosci. 2020; 14:36.

PMID: 32792919 PMC: 7387683. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2020.00036.


Unique N170 signatures to words and faces in deaf ASL signers reflect experience-specific adaptations during early visual processing.

Sehyr Z, Midgley K, Holcomb P, Emmorey K, Plaut D, Behrmann M Neuropsychologia. 2020; 141:107414.

PMID: 32142729 PMC: 7192317. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107414.


References
1.
Lehmann D, Skrandies W . Spatial analysis of evoked potentials in man--a review. Prog Neurobiol. 1984; 23(3):227-50. DOI: 10.1016/0301-0082(84)90003-0. View

2.
Tanaka J, Curran T . A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychol Sci. 2001; 12(1):43-7. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00308. View

3.
Knowlton B, Squire L . The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. Science. 1993; 262(5140):1747-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.8259522. View

4.
Reber P, Stark C, Squire L . Cortical areas supporting category learning identified using functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(2):747-50. PMC: 18492. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.2.747. View

5.
Schacter D, Uecker A, Reiman E, Yun L, Bandy D, Chen K . Effects of size and orientation change on hippocampal activation during episodic recognition: a PET study. Neuroreport. 1998; 8(18):3993-8. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199712220-00028. View