» Articles » PMID: 10489259

Contrasting Cortical Activity Associated with Category Memory and Recognition Memory

Overview
Journal Learn Mem
Specialty Neurology
Date 1999 Sep 17
PMID 10489259
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We collected functional neuroimaging data while volunteers performed similar categorization and recognition memory tasks. In the categorization task, volunteers first studied a series of 40 dot patterns that were distortions of a nonstudied prototype dot pattern. After a delay, while fMRI data were collected, they categorized 72 novel dot patterns according to whether or not they belonged to the previously studied category. In the recognition task, volunteers first studied five dot patterns eight times each. After a delay, while fMRI data were collected, they judged whether each of 72 dot patterns had been studied earlier. We found strikingly different patterns of brain activity in visual processing areas for the two tasks. During the categorization task, the familiar stimuli were associated with decreased activity in posterior occipital cortex, whereas during the recognition task, the familiar stimuli were associated with increased activity in this area. The findings indicate that these two types of memory have contrasting effects on early visual processing and reinforce the view that declarative and nondeclarative memory operate independently.

Citing Articles

The Role of Edge-Based and Surface-Based Information in Incidental Category Learning: Evidence From Behavior and Event-Related Potentials.

Zhou X, Fu Q, Rose M Front Integr Neurosci. 2020; 14:36.

PMID: 32792919 PMC: 7387683. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2020.00036.


Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Multiple Memory Systems During Category Learning.

Morgan K, Zeithamova D, Luu P, Tucker D Brain Sci. 2020; 10(4).

PMID: 32283678 PMC: 7226166. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10040224.


Understanding the Neural Bases of Implicit and Statistical Learning.

Batterink L, Paller K, Reber P Top Cogn Sci. 2019; 11(3):482-503.

PMID: 30942536 PMC: 7723461. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12420.


Which Matters More in Incidental Category Learning: Edge-Based Versus Surface-Based Features.

Zhou X, Fu Q, Rose M, Sun Y Front Psychol. 2019; 10:183.

PMID: 30792675 PMC: 6375183. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00183.


Quantitative modeling of category learning deficits in various patient populations.

Filoteo J, Maddox W, Ashby F Neuropsychology. 2018; 31(8):862-876.

PMID: 29376668 PMC: 5836726. DOI: 10.1037/neu0000422.


References
1.
Schacter D, Alpert N, Savage C, Rauch S, Albert M . Conscious recollection and the human hippocampal formation: evidence from positron emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93(1):321-5. PMC: 40230. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.1.321. View

2.
Rugg M, Fletcher P, Frith C, Frackowiak R, Dolan R . Brain regions supporting intentional and incidental memory: a PET study. Neuroreport. 1997; 8(5):1283-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199703240-00045. View

3.
Backman L, Almkvist O, Andersson J, Nordberg A, Winblad B, Reineck R . Brain activation in young and older adults during implicit and explicit retrieval. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 9(3):378-91. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.3.378. View

4.
Schacter D . Priming and multiple memory systems: perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 4(3):244-56. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.244. View

5.
Hamann S, Squire L . Intact perceptual memory in the absence of conscious memory. Behav Neurosci. 1997; 111(4):850-4. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.111.4.850. View