» Articles » PMID: 32761255

Using Modern Approaches to Sedimentation Velocity to Detect Conformational Changes in Proteins

Overview
Journal Eur Biophys J
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2020 Aug 8
PMID 32761255
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has been known for decades that proteins undergo conformational changes in response to binding ligands. Such changes are usually accompanied by a loss of entropy by the protein, and thus conformational changes are integral to the thermodynamics of ligand association. Methods to detect these alterations are numerous; here, we focus on the sedimentation velocity (SV) mode of AUC, which has several advantages, including ease of use and rigorous data-selection criteria. In SV, it is assumed that conformational changes manifest primarily as differences in the sedimentation coefficient (the s-value). Two methods of determining s-value differences were assessed. The first method used the widely adopted c(s) distribution to gather statistics on the s-value differences to determine whether the observed changes were reliable. In the second method, a decades-old technique called "difference SV" was revived and updated to address its viability in this era of modern instrumentation. Both methods worked well to determine the extent of conformational changes to three model systems. Both simulations and experiments were used to explore the strengths and limitations of the methods. Finally, software incorporating these methodologies was produced.

Citing Articles

Strong non-ideality effects at low protein concentrations: considerations for elongated proteins.

Yarawsky A, Dinu V, Harding S, Herr A Eur Biophys J. 2023; 52(4-5):427-438.

PMID: 37055656 PMC: 10599268. DOI: 10.1007/s00249-023-01648-x.


SViMULATE: a computer program facilitating interactive, multi-mode simulation of analytical ultracentrifugation data.

Brautigam C Eur Biophys J. 2023; 52(4-5):293-302.

PMID: 36890221 DOI: 10.1007/s00249-023-01637-0.


Biophysical Approaches for the Characterization of Protein-Metabolite Interactions.

Thalhammer A, Broker N Methods Mol Biol. 2022; 2554:199-229.

PMID: 36178628 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2624-5_13.


Analytical ultracentrifugation: still the gold standard that offers multiple solutions.

Dobson R, Patel T Eur Biophys J. 2020; 49(8):673-676.

PMID: 33211149 DOI: 10.1007/s00249-020-01483-4.

References
1.
Zhao H, Ghirlando R, Piszczek G, Curth U, Brautigam C, Schuck P . Recorded scan times can limit the accuracy of sedimentation coefficients in analytical ultracentrifugation. Anal Biochem. 2013; 437(1):104-8. PMC: 3676908. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2013.02.011. View

2.
Rees A, Debuysere M, Lewis E . Difference sedimentation velocity adapted to low molecular weight proteins. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1977; 182(2):478-87. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9861(77)90528-8. View

3.
Harris S, Winzor D . Thermodynamic nonideality as a probe of allosteric mechanisms: preexistence of the isomerization equilibrium for rabbit muscle pyruvate kinase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1988; 265(2):458-65. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9861(88)90150-6. View

4.
Brown P, Schuck P . A new adaptive grid-size algorithm for the simulation of sedimentation velocity profiles in analytical ultracentrifugation. Comput Phys Commun. 2008; 178(2):105-120. PMC: 2267755. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2007.08.012. View

5.
Catterall W, Wisedchaisri G, Zheng N . The chemical basis for electrical signaling. Nat Chem Biol. 2017; 13(5):455-463. PMC: 5464002. DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.2353. View